Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02809
Original file (BC-2011-02809.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

AFBCMR BC-2011-02809 

 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR 

 

SUBJECT: 

 

 Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our 
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the 
applicant's records should be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the 
Chief of Staff or his designee. 

 

 The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to 
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that that she did not tender her resignation and was not 
discharged from all Regular Air Force appointments on 1 March 2011, but on that date, she was 
continued on active duty until 9 March 2011, on which date she tendered her resignation, was 
discharged from all Regular Air Force appointments, and was released from active duty and 
transferred to the Air Force Reserve. 

 

 Members of the Board considered this application on 27 March 2012. 

 

 

 

 

Panel Chair 

 

 

Attachment: 

Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 30 Jan 12 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01985

    Original file (BC-2010-01985.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01060

    Original file (BC-2007-01060.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPA further states the applicant was briefed by recruiting on or about 20 December 2006 correctly regarding the scroll process which caused a break in service between her date of separation (DOS) and her appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states she understands that her start date in the Reserves cannot be changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05291

    Original file (BC 2013 05291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04007

    Original file (BC 2013 04007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service dates be adjusted to remove her break in service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Officers with a regular commission cannot be gained into the United States Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03560

    Original file (BC 2013 03560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant's request to reflect no break in service. The office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel (OSD/GC) determined the appointment date is the date the SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803570

    Original file (9803570.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While completing the required documents to be released from active duty in 1997, she was unaware as to the meaning of “resigning her commission” and being released from active duty. While she was requesting separation from active duty, she completed paperwork for a reserve assignment. Based on the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02626

    Original file (BC-2004-02626.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    If she is not excused from further service and given an honorable discharge with back pay, she receive full pay from the date of her graduation through the date of any decision by the Board. Counsel’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Legal Advisor reviewed counsel’s response to his original advisory and recommends the applicant be granted retroactive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006466

    Original file (20090006466.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 May 2001; * NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service); * State of North Carolina, Orders 009-815, dated 9 January 2004, discharging her from the Army National Guard; * Departments of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Special Orders Number 34 AR, dated 12 February 2004; *...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02113

    Original file (BC-2011-02113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She notes that even the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Fact Sheet on the IRR does not disclose information about a Reserve officer’s promotion status and led her to believe that she would not be discharged unless she requested resignation of her commission. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force with a separation pay benefit prior to completing her MSO.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02012

    Original file (BC-2011-02012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be amended to void the recoupment of her Critical Skills Accession Bonus (CSAB) for her sponsorship in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AF HPSP). The complete HQ AFPC/DPAME evaluation is at Exhibit...