RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02746 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be credited with one (1) additional point for the Retirement 
Year Ending (RYE) 18 May 03. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

During this time frame, he was transferring from an Air Force 
Reserve unit to the Air National Guard (ANG) after being 
released as a part of the Stop Loss initiative. He believes he 
has been the victim of an injustice because he was not allowed 
to transfer from the Air Force Reserve unit to the ANG unit when 
he moved. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a 
computer printout, Service History, dated 18 Jul 11 and his 
DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Force of the 
United States, dated 1 Mar 03. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

During the RYE of 18 May 03, the applicant was credited with 
1 active duty point, 33 inactive duty training points, and 
15 membership points, totaling 49 points. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/A1PS recommends denial stating, in part, the documentation 
provided did not reflect an error or injustice. The applicant 
was asked to provide further documentation; however, he did not 
respond. 

 

The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 


 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 18 Nov 11 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the National Guard Bureau office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. in 
addition, the NGB/A1PS requested the applicant provide 
additional documentation to substantiate his appeal; however he 
did not respond. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02746 in Executive Session on 10 April 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jul 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 10 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Nov 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair