RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 1 June 2011 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: During the FA on 1 June 2011 he injured himself while doing sit- ups. After an MRI and a referral to an Orthopedic Surgeon it was discovered that he had a torn meniscus and Patella Femoral Syndrome. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his AFFMS Individual Test History, and a letter from the Flight Surgeon addressed to the 78th MDG/SGPZ. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt), E-5. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per 3 component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within 1 minute each). Military members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 scale based on the following maximum component scores: 60 points for aerobic, 20 points for body composition, 10 points for push-ups and 10 points for sit- ups. To determine individual composite fitness scores the Air Force uses age and gender specific fitness score charts The applicant was required to earn an overall composite score of 75 or greater. His overall score was 80.60 but his fitness level was listed as unsatisfactory because he failed to meet the minimum component value for the sit-ups in his specific age and gender group (Exhibit B). He completed 37 sit-ups in one minute; the minimum component value for his age and gender group is 42 sit-ups in one minute. Minimum component scores are established to ensure that members test adequately in all components rather than excelling in some and disregarding others. The applicant failed the Muscular Fitness portion of the test therefore his overall FA rating was “Unsatisfactory.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PP recommends denial. In an undated memorandum A1PP states, based on the information provided there is no clear documentation that the injury occurred during or before the sit- ups portion of the FA. The request was reviewed by the Aerospace Medicine Policy office and they concur that the applicant’s 1 June 2011 FA record should remain in AFFMS. The complete HQ USAF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 November 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application BC-2011-02810 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 July 2011, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Excerpt from AFI 36-2905 Fitness Assessment. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, undated Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 November 2011. Panel Chair