Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02782
Original file (BC-2011-02782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02782 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be 
upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He has made mistakes in his life; however, he has learned from 
his mistakes. He paid his dues to society and has become a 
better man. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, a certificate of completion to NCO Leadership School and a 
copy of his driver’s license. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19 March 1974. 

 

The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to 
recommend his discharge from the Air Force under the provisions 
of AFM 39-12. The specific reason for this action was for the 
murder of his wife. 

 

He was advised of his rights in this matter and elected to submit 
statements in his own behalf. In a legal review of the case 
file, the staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient 
and recommended discharge. The applicant received a UOTHC 
discharge on 10 Dec 80 after serving 6 years, 8 months, and 
22 days on active duty. 

 

 

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to 
identify an arrest record. 


 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication 
the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper or 
contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect 
at the time, or the actions taken against the applicant were 
based on factors other than his own misconduct. Having found no 
error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while 
the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis 
exists to grant favorable action on his request. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02782 in Executive Session on 15 Mar 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-02782 
was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jul 11, w/atchs. 


 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01414

    Original file (BC-2011-01414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01414 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). On 3 November 1971, the applicant volunteered for rehabilitation under the United States Air Force Drug Abuse Program. The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02782

    Original file (BC-2012-02782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02782 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives payment for accrued leave days. At this time, no records are available of the applicant’s leave accrual and use from 1973. While his DD form 214 indicates that his accrued leave balance was not available at the time of his separation, it...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00435

    Original file (BC-2011-00435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She understands the mistakes she made as a teen and does not have time to mess up another opportunity to serve her country. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of an upgrade to her discharge. We considered upgrading her RE and separation code based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01865

    Original file (BC-2013-01865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 Jun 2011, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Air Force as a result of his civilian conviction. Furthermore, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change to his discharge characterization. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 14 Jun 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02466

    Original file (BC-2011-02466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Dec 05, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary Infractions. On 7 Dec 10, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. RE Code 2B, is required per AFI 36-2606,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03525

    Original file (BC-2010-03525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s commander approved the recommendation of the discharge board on 26 Nov 80. The applicant received a UOTHC discharge on 8 Dec 80 after serving 6 years and 14 days on active duty. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit A.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01148

    Original file (BC-2011-01148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 2C (involuntary separation with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to enter into the Air Force Reserves. On 11 June 2011, the applicant acknowledged his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01987

    Original file (BC-2006-01987.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of being found guilty, the applicant was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for five months, forfeiture of $275 per month for five months, and reduction to the grade of airman basic (E-1). The applicant did not provide any facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge, nor did he submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in his discharge processing. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00446

    Original file (BC-2003-00446.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge authority approved the request for discharge (in lieu of court- martial) and ordered a UOTHC discharge on 22 August 1984. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. After careful consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication that the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time, or that the actions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03557

    Original file (BC-2010-03557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    0RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03557 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12, para 2-15a, section B,...