RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02720
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer
Eligibility Benefits (TEB) to his dependent son.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 26 Feb 10, he submitted his Transfer Request form to the
Veteran Affairs (VA) office. He did not enroll his son as a
dependent because he was an active duty Air Force member at the
time.
On 12 Aug 10, his son was separated from active duty with a
general discharge and is not eligible for GI Bill benefits. He
would like to transfer 12 months of his TEB to his son.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his
transfer request.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 Jan 03, the applicant was discharged for retirement. On
29 Oct 09, he was returned to active duty through the retired
rated recall program.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states eligible family
members must be reported in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility
Reporting System (DEERS) and be eligible for benefits as defined
by law at the time of approval of the members request. The
applicants son was not listed in DEERS and did not meet
dependent requirements. DPSIT notes eligible family members
must be less than 23 years old and be enrolled in a full-time
course of study.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 16 Sep 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 30 Mar 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-02720:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Jun 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIT, dated 29 Aug 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Sep 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03038
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03038 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits (TEB) to his dependent. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04059
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04059 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His ability to transfer any/all remaining Post 9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his daughter be restored. While we acknowledge the applicants request to transfer Post- 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his daughter, we do not believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01017
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. On 28 Jan 11, the applicant received pre-separation counseling and indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component (AC) Service Members that he wanted counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs requirement to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04096
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219
Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the members request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00786
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In 2009, he registered for Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits with the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and was led to believe that his Defense Enrollment Eligibility System (DEERS) dependents would be automatically eligible to receive the education benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00223
The Public Law states in part, that “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” Articles were published that explained the program benefits and requirements. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-00223 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member All...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03582
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty, or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record; most notably, that the applicant was sent a notice to specify the number of months he wished to transfer to each dependent...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03772
He became aware, after retiring from the Air Force, that he needed to transfer his educational benefits prior to retirement. The applicanst Certificate of Eligibility from the VA is dated 22 June 2009. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...