AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02016
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement and copies of his NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service and special orders. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02161 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to Force Shaping. The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code JBK (less...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02241
DPAPP states the documentation submitted by the applicant fails to substantiate foreign service time in the airspace over Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant has submitted all of the documentation he has to support his claim of flight over Vietnam. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below _______________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02252
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02252 INDEX CODE: 129.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted time in service credit for the maximum time allowed for his grade of (major). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02261
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The medical board determined that her disability resulted from her military service; however, this was not reflected on her discharge paperwork. On 18 Apr 03, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for further service and recommended her discharge under other than Chapter 61, Title 10 United States Code (USC) at the rating of 10 percent, but without compensation (as...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02327
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02448
His records met a highly competitive board without the MSM and may have caused his non-selection. We note the applicant’s belief that the absence of the MSM from his records may have caused his nonselection to promotion of major; however, we are not persuaded that the evidence presented substantiates his claim. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Dec 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02458
A1PS notes reserve component members who complete a period of active duty in which leave was accrued and are not able to carry over leave into another active duty tour are paid for that leave; however, payment for accured leave counts toward the career cap and cannot exceed 60 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02480
DPSIDEP states the Air Force does not require the designated rater to be the ratee’s immediate supervisor. DPSIDEP notes the statement provided by the applicant was written by a member of the Air National Guard not assigned to his squadron. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Feb 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02491
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 13 Dec 85, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of six years. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02499
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02499 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and other unit medals for the time he served in Vietnam. VSM Criterion: The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02501
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE AND BCMR MEDICAL CONSULTANT EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 28 Jan 10. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jan 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02505
DPP notes the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate, reflects the servicemember elected Option A, decline to make an election until age 60. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s deceased husband, upon notification of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, originally elected Option A under the RCSBP thereby electing not to make a decision regarding coverage for the applicant until he reached age 60. The evidence of record does show the deceased service member requested...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02515
A special court-martial order, dated 20 May 99, indicates the applicant was charged and pled guilty to the following specifications: 1) On or about 17 Oct 98, he assaulted an airman by displaying a knife to him. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for two months, and a reduction in grade to airman basic. JAJM opines it would be offensive to all those who served honorably to extend the same benefits to someone who committed a crime such as the applicant’s while on active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02522
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C & D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR notes the VMPF data printout provided by the applicant indicates an MSM was approved on 2 Jul 01 by Special Order (SO) GC-283; however, the official SO 283...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02537
Because of these incidents, he feels he should not have been discharged due to a CM, but medically discharged for a mental disability. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. Over 50 years have passed...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02545
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The former service member enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 Feb 73. The information provided by the applicant did not verify her husband served in Thailand or Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted a copy of a letter from someone who served...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02549
DPSIDR states the PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action. The applicant’s record shows he was convicted by Summary Court Martial on 29 Sep 50; therefore, he is ineligible to receive the GCM. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request for award of the PH, CAR, GCM, and KDSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02620
He was discharged with an uncharacterized, entry-level separation for Personality Disorder and issued a separation code of JFX and an RE code of 2C on 25 Sep 02. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02621
The summary indicates the applicant denied all prior history of sleepwalking/frequent trouble sleeping on his entrance physical exam dated 29 Dec 00; however, he stated “sleepwalking has not been an issue since age 16.” The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found his conditions Existed Prior To Service (EPTS) and referred him to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council directed the applicant be separated from active service for physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02627
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02627 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to general. He was credited with 2 years, 2 months and 17 days of service to include 3 years, 5 months and 3 days of lost time due to confinement. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02663
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2009-2663 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02670
While Air Force policy requires performance feedback for personnel, a direct correlation between the information provided during a feedback session, and the assessment on evaluation reports does not necessarily exist. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02730
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial. The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Jun 10, for review and comment...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02738
Since the period of time allowed by law to make a deemed election for former spouse coverage has already passed, the only way the Board can grant the applicant’s request to change the record is if he were to provide a notarized statement from his current spouse relinquishing her entitlement to the SBP. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, dated 29 Jan 10. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Jan 10, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02798
After reviewing the evidence of record it is our opinion that the narrative reason improperly labels the reason for the applicant’s discharge and should be changed to “Secretarial Authority.” However, in regards to his request to change his character of service, we find that based on the criterion provided by the Department of Defense for a member serving less than 180 days of service, the applicant’s character of service is correct. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02847
In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from the Veterans Service Office, a personal statement, and a copy of his DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Sharpshooter Badge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02857
Members of the Board, considered this application on 8 April 2010. Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, SAF/MRBP, dtd 8 Jan 10 AFBCMR BC-2009-02857 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02864
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02864 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant was discharged on 3 Jun 81. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 1 Dec 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02935
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an email stating he could request his retirement date be moved from 1 Aug 09 to 1 Sep 09 to take advantage of the new GI Bill and transfer benefits. The applicant’s last duty day was 31 Jul 09 with a 1 Aug 09 retirement date. Additionally, the application does not state applications would be received until 31 Jul 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02996
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02996 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 3 Dec 86, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibits F and G).
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03095
The applicant had time to change her election, with her husbands concurrence, prior to her retirement date. DPSIAR indicates there is no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice in this case. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03107
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2009-03107 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03130
The policy staff was contacted to inquire if he could be allowed to participate; however, the request was denied in May 05 as he was outside the open window dates and no longer eligible for ECLRP. Additionally, we note that by the time he made contact with the right office, he was not eligible to enter the program because he had reenlisted. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2009-03130 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03146
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request to have his rank changed on his DD Form 214. The complete DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. BCMR MEDICAL CONSULTANT’S EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03147
In support of his request, the applicant submits his discharge case file and report of medical history. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Feb 10, for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03206
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. DPSOR opines the member and his commander clearly initiated the CSB election knowing the applicant was facing medical discharge action and there was no way he...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03212
The AFDRB concluded the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 20 May 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03243
He slowly developed a series of various medical illnesses that prevented him from following through with the submission of a claim for his military retirement pay. DPP states the former military member completed the service requirements for retired pay and on 6 Aug 81, he was issued an official Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at age 60. The complete SAF/MRB Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03284
In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, copies of the referral EPR memorandum, the referral EPR, his rebuttal statement, the initial referral EPR, an award nomination, a letter to his congressman, his student training report, a memorandum from his group superintendent, a statement of suspect/witness complaint, an evaluation appeals form, and a letter from his commander. The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit B. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03289
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of the contested EPR, his quarterly award nomination letter, and his performance feedback worksheets. The following is a resume of his performance reports: Close-Out Date Overall Rating 25 May 01 5 25 May 02 5 9 Dec 02 5 27 May 03 5 13 Mar 04 5 13 Mar 05 5 13 Mar 06 5 +13 Mar 07 4 13 Mar 08 5 PERFORMANCE REPORTS CONTINUED: 13 Mar 09 5 + Contested Report The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03347
The parties divorced on 13 Nov 84, and the divorce decree ordered the member to continue the SBP on the applicant’s behalf. The deceased member’s decision not to voluntarily elect former spouse SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf shows his intent not to provide SBP for her. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case, to include her response to the Air Force evaluation; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03350
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36‑2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Messrs. James W. Russell, III, Oliver Fritz, and Dick Anderegg, considered this application on 12 January 2010. Air Force Board for Correction
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03367
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-03367 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal and that he received Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Purple Heart Criteria: In accordance with Army Regulation (AR)...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-03409 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant’s request is unclear; however, it appears he is requesting his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded so that he can seek help from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). On...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03438
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2009-03438 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03439
AFBCMR BC-2009-03439 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 23 September 2006, he executed...