RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02261
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation of “Disability Existed Prior to Service
- PEB” be changed to show that her medical condition was service-connected.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The medical board determined that her disability resulted from her military
service; however, this was not reflected on her discharge paperwork.
In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her AF Form 618,
Medical Board Report and her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 Jun 01. After
completion of Basic Military Training and Technical School, she was
assigned duties as a Mental Health Apprentice.
Her Military Entry Processing Station (MEPS) Report of Medical History
dated 29 Aug 00 reflects “No;” indicating an absence of a previous history
of depression or excessive worry. On 23 Jan 02, the applicant was referred
by her supervisor to Life Skills for depressed mood due to financial and
weight problems. She also reported being molested from age 10 to 13 by an
older boy and girl. She was also reportedly raped at age 16.
On 11 Feb 02, she was diagnosed with “Major Depressive Disorder, single
episode, moderate, superimposed on Dysthymia.” On 31 Dec 02, a follow-up
report was provided from a civilian mental health group for the purpose of
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processing. On 20 Jan 03, she was diagnosed
with “Major Depression, single episode, chronic, but now severe with
psychotic features, rule-out Bipolar Disorder, rapid-cycling mixed.” She
was instructed to hand-carry a summary of her case to her primary care
manager for the purpose of initiating a MEB.
A MEB narrative summary dated 1 Apr 03, acknowledges her initial treatment
for depression. The applicant reported her depression “may have started
following entry into the Air Force and was exacerbated by being set back in
Basic Training.” She reported a downturn in her condition when her
boyfriend received a Permanent Change of Stations (PCS) in Oct 02. Her
mood worsened significantly as did her insomnia. She also reported that
she had been raped in the previous month and refused to name the assailant.
She became pregnant as a result, delivered at term and gave the infant up
for adoption. She was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder, single
episode, in partial remission. Her level of impairment for further
military duty was determined “Moderate” and her impairment for civilian
social and industrial adaptability was determined “Mild.” The evaluating
psychiatrist opined her medical condition was in the line of duty and that
it did not exist prior to service.
On 18 Apr 03, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the
applicant unfit for further service and recommended her discharge under
other than Chapter 61, Title 10 United States Code (USC) at the rating of
10 percent, but without compensation (as depicted by “N/A”) for a condition
determined to have existed prior to service (EPTS).
On 22 Apr 03, the applicant concurred with the IPEB decision. The
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) assigned a 30 percent disability
rating for Major Depressive Disorder, effective 10 Jun 03, issued one year
after the applicant’s date of separation.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and E.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the preponderance of evidence
reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process
or at the time of separation.
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant relief by
changing the record to reflect that she was found unfit due to Major
Depressive Disorder, that the condition was service incurred or aggravated,
and that it resulted in her discharge with severance pay with a compensable
disability rating of 10 percent.
The Medical Consultant opines there is sufficient evidence of stressors
beginning after the applicant’s entry into military service to raise
reasonable doubt in favor of the applicant for a mental condition that was,
as a minimum, aggravated through military service. The Medical Consultant
notes even when considering that the applicant entered medical service with
a predisposition for developing a depressive disorder, he finds the EPTS
factor is unascertainable.
The Medical Consultant recommends removing the “N/A” and reaccomplishing
the AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical
Evaluation Board, to reflect that the Major Depressive Disorder is a
category 1 compensable and ratable medical condition. Based upon a
preponderance of medical evidence, the applicant’s clinical assessment at
discharge fit the picture of a 10 percent disability rating. Her Veterans
Affairs Schedule Rating Disability Code (VASRD) should remain 9434,
depicting depressive disorder.
The complete BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 5
Feb 10 and 28 May 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. Based on the evidence presented, we
agree with the Medical Consultant’s opinion that the IPEB finding of EPTS
for the applicant’s mental condition is unascertainable and therefore
should be determined as service incurred. Therefore, we recommend the
applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 23 Apr 03, she was found unfit to perform the duties of her
office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical disability, incurred
while she was entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in her case
was Major Depressive Disorder, Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating
Disabilities (VASRD) Code 9434, rated at 10 percent, that the disability
was not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence; and that the
disability was not received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed
conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war.
b. She was discharged from active duty on 9 Jun 03, with a 10
percent compensable disability rating, in the grade of Airman First Class.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 8 Sep 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009-02261:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Nov 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSD, dated 11 Dec 09.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Feb 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 25 May 10.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04050
She requested a medical separation; however, the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) stated her medical conditions were “pre-existing". The Medical Consultant states the record reflects that the applicant has experienced depression and anxiety since the age of 13. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force due to a medical condition that was determined to have existed prior to entering military service.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01560
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding of EPTS and recommends a change of records to show a disability discharge for Bulimia Nervosa at 10 percent. The decision to process a member through the military DES is determined by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when he or she is determined disqualified for continued military service. Based on the assessment by the BCMR Medical Consultant, it appears probable that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00019
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve (AFR) on 28 Jul 75. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. Exhibit G. Letter, Counsel, dated 17 Sep 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00509
If she were permanently retired she could receive proper medical care without delay by health care providers who specialize in her disorder. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant a permanent retirement with a 30 percent disability rating. The BCMR Medical Consultants complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01188
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her commander recommended her discharge for failure to meet Air Force weight standards, while the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended her discharge for a medical condition that existed prior to service (depression). The applicant was discharged on 19 Nov 97 and was issued an RE code of “2Q.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01037
The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found both her military and social impairment to be rated as considerable. Thus, the MEB placed her on the TDRL with a 30 percent disability rating. However, after she was reevaluated, the IPEB found the applicants medical condition had improved and recommended she be removed from the TDRL and separated with a 10 percent disability rating with severance pay. The Medical Consultants complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01037
The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found both her military and social impairment to be rated as considerable. Thus, the MEB placed her on the TDRL with a 30 percent disability rating. However, after she was reevaluated, the IPEB found the applicants medical condition had improved and recommended she be removed from the TDRL and separated with a 10 percent disability rating with severance pay. The Medical Consultants complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02712
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates in her response to the Air Force evaluation that she disagrees with the BCMR Medical Consultant’s statement of her request. AF Form 618, Medical Board Report, coupled with the narrative summaries/consultations, commander’s letters, etc., address her unfitting conditions as required for review by the PEB. Disability...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02024
On 15 Feb 02, IPEB reviewed the applicants case and recommended discharge under other than Chapter 61, 10 USC, noting the applicants medical condition existed prior to service (EPTS) and had not been permanently aggravated by military service. The applicant contends her medical conditions were incurred while on active duty and should be considered in line of duty based on the service connection decision by the DVA. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00615
______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the AFCM be denied. The complete AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the applicant’s records be changed to reflect she received a medical retirement with a 30 or 50 percent disability rating. The complete AFPC/DPSD complete evaluation is at Exhibit...