RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02161
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to Force Shaping.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His narrative reason states “Completion of Required Active Service;”
however, he was separated due to “Force Shaping.”
In support of the application, the applicant submits his DD Form 214 and a
letter from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman
basic on 14 Dec 04 for a period of six years. He was progressively
promoted to the grade of airman first class.
On 15 Mar 07, he was honorably discharged from service for completion of
required active service. He served two years, three months and two days on
active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant was separated
based on guidance in MPFM 06-73, FY06 Air Force Enlisted Force Shaping
Program, dated 16 Oct 06. His records reflect he was selected for the Date
of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program by his commander due to receiving
punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). On 1
Nov 06, he received an Article 15 for aider, abettor, or counselor of the
driver of a vehicle at the time of an accident, and having knowledge of
said accident, he did wrongfully order, cause, or permit the driver to
leave the scene of the accident without making his identity known. The
applicant was reduced to the grade of Airman Basic, ordered to forfeit
$636.00 pay per month for 2 months, received 45 days extra duty and was
reprimanded.
The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD)
code JBK (less than six years of active service) or … with a corresponding
narrative reason for separation of “Completion of Required Active Service.”
The member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and the
DOS/Expiration of Term of Service (ETS) may be involuntarily accelerated.
Although the applicant was separated under a force shaping program, the
specific program which resulted in his discharge was the DOS Rollback
program.
The complete DPSOS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Jan
10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 8 Apr 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009-02161:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jun 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 4 Jan 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jan 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00835
On 31 May 11, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation Of Airmen, with a narrative reason of completion of required active service, a corresponding SPD code of JBK, and an RE code of 2X. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01217
The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designation (SPD) codeJBK (less than 6 years of active service) with a correspondingnarrative reason for separation of Completion of Required ActiveService because the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ExpirationTerm of Service may be involuntarily accelerated. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, the discharge to include thecharacterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00067
While serving in the Air Force he had all but one 5 Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs). He received $10,314.00 in separation pay and received a 2X RE Code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00515
The applicant made the required $1,200 contribution and served a total of one year, seven months, and five days of active service before being separated under the provisions of the FY07 DOS Rollback Program on 1 August 2007. Item 3c of the DD Form 2366, Montgomery GI Bill of 1984 (MGIB) Basic Enrollment, which he signed on 3 January 2006, states “I must complete 36 months (3 years) of service…” Since the applicant served one year, seven months, and five days of active service, he did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04094 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation Pregnancy or Childbirth be changed to a medical discharge. On 20 Oct 11, in a corrected advisory, DPSOS further clarified their evaluation and stated since the applicant was not able to complete her service...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02696
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a medical condition (Graves Disease and Hyperthyroidism) prior to his discharge that the Air Force never treated him for nor followed-up on. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, and copies of his service and medical records. After considering the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and the BCMR Medical Consultant,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03676
DPSOS notes the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change and his discharge, to include his characterization of service, was within the discharge authoritys discretion. DPSOA states the applicant was ineligible for reenlistment and was discharged under the Air Force Rollback Program with an honorable character of service on 15 Mar 07 after serving 10 months and 14 days on active duty. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...