RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-03367
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Purple Heart
(PH) medal and that he received Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He flew 35 combat missions and was shot down 3 times. He brought his 10-
man crew home safely 35 times. On 1 Sep 44, he injured his back when he
crash landed on a British Air Base in Pescara, Italy. The Flight Surgeon
told him back surgery would be too risky and that he should learn to live
with the pain. He feels he should have qualified for the PH medal.
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of a flight record
and a mission log.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant voluntarily retired for years of service on 1 Nov 63. He
served 20 years, 1 month and 24 days on active duty.
The applicant’s request for CRSC was previously considered and denied by
the Board on 22 Sep 05 and 4 Sep 07.
Purple Heart Criteria: In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45,
Decorations, dated 22 Sep 43, during the period in question, the PH was
awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the United
States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided such wound
necessitated treatment by a medical officer. For the purpose of awarding
the PH, a wound was defined as an injury to any part of the body from an
outside force, element, or agent, sustained as the result of a hostile act
of the enemy, or while in action in the face of the enemy. When a person
eligible for award of the PH was treated for a wound, the commanding
officer of the hospital, or the medical officer who treated the wound,
furnished the commanding officer of the wounded person a certificate
briefly describing the nature of the wound, and certifying the necessity of
treatment. In addition, a wounded soldier’s unsupported statement could be
accepted in unusual or extenuating circumstances when, in the opinion of
the officer making the award, no corroborative evidence was obtainable.
However, the statement would be substantiated if possible.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states there is no official
documentation located within the applicant’s official military record
verifying he was injured by direct enemy actions. Additionally, his
military record does not contain any official medical documentation
verifying he received medical treatment for a back injury during Sep 44.
DPSIDR notes the applicant has not provided a certified eyewitness
statement to corroborate his claim or official medical documentation to
validate medical treatment was needed or received.
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states there should be no question his injury was a direct
result of enemy action. His records from the Department of Veterans
Affairs should be accepted since his service records from World War II
(WWII) in Italy are incomplete. He learned to live with his pain until the
pain was so bad he had to be hospitalized for two weeks. He is a lucky
survivor of 35 WWII missions and he thanks the Lord for another day.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of his complete submission
in judging the merits of the case; however, evidence has not been presented
which would lead us to believe that his injuries were incurred as a direct
result of enemy action. The personal sacrifice the applicant has endured
for his country is noted; however, his injuries do not meet the criteria
for the award of the Purple Heart medal. In addition, we agree with the
previous determination of the Board his injuries were not combat-related
and therefore do not qualify for compensation under the CRSC Act. We are
not unmindful or unappreciative of his service to the Nation; however, in
the absence of documentary evidence to corroborate his claim, we have no
basis on which to favorably consider this application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application on 18 Aug
10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered AFBCMR BC-2009-03367:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Sep 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 20 Jan 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Feb 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Feb 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00937
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR advises that, to be awarded the PH, a member must provide detailed evidence/documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and received treatment by medical personnel. By the time he was liberated from the POW camp nine months later, his wounds had healed and no further treatment was necessary. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Jun 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03522
On 5 Mar 08, applicants record was administratively corrected to include award of the Prisoner of War Medal, for the period of 8 Mar 6 May 45, while a POW in Germany. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal for injuries he received in action against an enemy of the United States...
The applicant has not provided any documentation showing that he received medical treatment for either injury and there is no documentation in his medical file mentioning either of these injuries. Therefore, we conclude that any doubt should be resolved in this applicant’s favor and recommend he be awarded the PH for injuries sustained after bailing out of his B-24 bomber on 9 Feb 45. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 31 Jul 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04682
An undated medical note provided by the applicant reflects he has a discharge from his left ear and left ear drum scarring. The applicants WD AGO Form 100, Separation Qualification Records, reflects that his left ear drum was moderately scarred, but does not indicate that said injury was the result of enemy action. When his ear drum was ruptured by an enemy shell bursting near him, he was examined by a medic who made the determination that he was not injured as badly as others and left...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03797
DPSIDR states the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his claim and they are unable to make a determination at this time. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, in the absence of evidence of his entitlement to any additional awards or medals, no further action by this Board is necessary.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03692
The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicants complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03692 in Executive Session on 7 Apr 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03812
The applicant does not provide medical documentation or any eye witness statements verifying that his injury was a result of combat action with the enemy. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01675
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for an injury he sustained when his aircraft was shot down on 4 Aug 44, and any other awards to which he may be entitled. His available records reflect he enlisted in the Army on...
Regarding award of the DFC, prior to 14 Aug 43, this decoration was awarded on the basis of 35 missions of operational flight against the enemy. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the advisory opinion and stated the applicant’s injury was the result of damage to the aircraft by enemy flak during a bomb run, and, therefore, was a direct result of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01670
The applicant received frostbite injuries in January 1945 while a POW; however, frostbite is not normally an injury which qualifies a member for entitlement to the PH. In this respect, we note Army Regulation 600-45, provides that the PH Medal may be awarded to members who are wounded in action against an enemy of the United States, and defined a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained as a result of a hostile act of the enemy. Exhibit...