Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02
Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

S

MEH: mh
Docket No: 6342-02
17 September 2002

This is in reference to  your application for correction of   your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on. 17 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8  
is attached.

Your allegations of error and

15/372  of 28 August 2002, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
PERSONNEL  COMMA

NAVY 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

ND

1160
Ser 
28 Aug 2002

815/37?_

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

PERS-OOZCB

BCNR PETITION 

ICC

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd  18 Mar 02

(a) 
(b) OPNAVINST  
(c)  NAVADMIN 

1160.6A
049/01

Encl:

(1)  BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner's ADSD is 25 November 1987.

passed through zone
The petitioner's EAOS at the time of passing through zone "C" was
30 May 2002 with an SEAOS of 30 July 2002.

The petitioner
"C" window of eligibility on 24 November   2001.

b.

Reference (b) provides an early SRB window during the

month of passing through zone and on or before the date of passing
through zone.
"C" window
is from  10 years active service to   14 years and pays out to the   16
year point.

Additionally, per reference  

(b) the zone  

C .

The petitioner requests to backdate the current

"C" SRB entitlement.

reenlistment of   14 June 2002 to 24 November 2001 and receive a
Reference (c) released on 02 March  
zone
with an effective date of 01 March 2001 did not list a zone "C"
SRB entitlement for the  
ETSS(OOO0)  rate at the time the member
passed through zone.

20(

31

In view of the above,

2.
as is.

recommend the petitioner's record remain

This is an advisory memorandum to reference

3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.

  (a) for the   use by

Enclosure

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02

    Original file (07306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03163-01

    Original file (03163-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released on 10 Reference (c) released on 02 d. The petitioner requests to backdated the 15 February 2001 to 13 January 2001 and receive the zone "B" SRB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06787-07

    Original file (06787-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/547 dtd 28 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 02 October 2000 and received a zone ‘B” SRB incentive. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01

    Original file (02469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00

    Original file (08684-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07561-00

    Original file (07561-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2001. The requests to backdate the reenlistment of 09 November 2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement 2000 to 26 July offered in reference (b). November 1997 for three years and received a zone "A" SRB entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00658-04

    Original file (00658-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner passed through the zone “A” SRB window on 22 January 1998. The petitioner requests to backdate the 18 May 1998 reenlistment contract to 22 January 1998 and receive the zone “A” SRB offered in reference (b) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08756-01

    Original file (08756-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 02 January 2001 for four "C" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner received 47 months...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04793-06

    Original file (04793-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests SRB eligible reenlistment effective 20 April 2006 and receive the zone “C” SRB offered in reference (b) The petitioner is ineligible for the zone “C” SRB entitlement. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00

    Original file (07339-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...