Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00
Original file (07339-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

Docket No: 733940
20 March 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 16 January 2001, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

OEPARTMENT  OF THE NAVY

NAVY  
YlLLllDTOW  

S710  

?SRSONNLL  COMMAND

INTSDRITY  

DRIVL

TN  

J8OSS-0000

1160
PERS-815
16 Jan 01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

PERS-OOZCB

BCNR PETITION IC

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 19 

Ott  00

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) OPNAVINST  

050/00
1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNK File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner's ADSD is 25 October 1990.

b.

The petitioner received approval on  

CT0  rating via "A" school training.

26 July  2000 for
set for 14 September 2000 through 

The

conversion to the 
petitioner's school date was
November 2000.

20

C .

Reference (b) listed a zone "B" SRB entitlement for the

CTO(OOO0)  rate at the time the petitioner received the conversion
approval.

The petitioner passed through the zone "B" window of

eligibility on 24 October 2000.

The petitioner completed  

CT0 "A" school training in

November 2000.
for the 

Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement

CTO(OOO0)  rate: there was not a zone "C" entitlement.

d.

e.

f.

cl-

The petitioner requests reenlistment entitlements under

because of passing through zone "B" while attending

the zone "B"
"A" school.

Per reference (c),

section (M) note 11, service members

must successfully complete formal training and be designated in
the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new
skill award level.

h.

PERS 815 does not have the authority to recommend

backdating the petitioner's completion date of training to allow
the opportunity to receive the zone
passing through the zone.
according to availability.

"B" SRB entitlement prior to

"A" schools seats are set

Additionally,

Subj:

BCNR PETITION

ICO:

2.
as is.
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
is returned.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a)

In view of the above,

recommend the petitioner's record remain

for use by the
Enclosure (1)

EjNC(AW)
dead!.
eenlistment

/

P

SN

Incentives Branch

.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00

    Original file (08684-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00

    Original file (03896-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01

    Original file (01109-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01

    Original file (02284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01

    Original file (01302-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA ā€œAā€ school training and receive the zone ā€œCā€ SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02927-01

    Original file (02927-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a However, d. Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present enlistment. The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A" "A" window of eligibility on 22 February However, the The member will Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO In view of the above, 2. remain as is. recommend the petitioner's record to This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for 3. the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99

    Original file (00280-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02379-01

    Original file (02379-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. "A" SRB entitlement for the petitioner reenlisted, available for the SRB entitlement. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00935-01

    Original file (00935-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additiion, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 attached.