DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 2469-01
5 February 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 815 of 12 July 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
DRIVE
YILLI*Dlow
2SO55-0000
INTEDRITY
5720
TN
1160
PERS-815
12 Jul 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD
FC?, CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
PERS-OOZCB
BCNR PETITION ICO
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 15 Mar 01
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) OPNAVINST
132/99
1160.6A
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of
the
a.
The petitioner's ADSD is 16 December 1986.
received BUPERS orders 2340 on 21 August 2000 to attend NTECHTR
GOODFELLOW AFB (under instruction) with several other intermediate
activities under instruction to complete training on 17 November
The petitioner's orders also required the
2000 for NEC 9204.
member to obliserve for three years.
"C" SRB entitlement for the
petitioner received the orders.
CTI(9204) rate/NEC at the time the
Reference
(b) carried a zone
The petitioner
b.
The petitioner later
BUPERS orders 2340 on 06 September 2000.
changed the petitioner's completion date of training from 17
November 2000 to 12 January 2001.
obliserve requirements were changed from three years to four
years.
Additionally,
receixred orders modifications to the
The orders modification
the petitioner's
The petitioner passed through the zone "C" window of
eligibility on 15 December 2000 while in a student status.
C .
d.
The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB
eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340.
e.
Per reference (c),
section (M) note 11, service members
must successfully complete formal training and be designated in
the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new
skill award level.
f.
The petitioner passed through the zone "C" SRB eligible
the petitioner is not eligible to receive the zone "C"
window approximately one month prior to obtaining the NEC 9204.
Therefore,
Per reference (c), the zone "C" window of
entitlement.
eligibility is from 10 years active service to 14 years.
Additionally,
orders modification of
the petitioner was required to comply with BUPERS
06 September 2000.
Subj:
BCNR PETITION
ICC
In view of the above,
2.
as is.
recommend the petitioner's record remain
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
3.
Board for Correction of Naval R
is returned.
Enclosure (1)
Reenlistment
Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01
Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08159-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.