Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
Original file (08684-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 8684-00
27 March 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 March 2001.
Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 1 March 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon quest.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

dEPARTMENT  OF THE 
DRIVE

?LRIOWWEL  COMMAND

IltlDRlTY  

MAW  

S7tO  
YlLLllDTOll

 

II 

~8055-0000

NAW

1160
PERS-815
01 Mar  01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

PERS-OOZCB

BCNR PETITION ICO

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 07 

Dee 00

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) NAVADMIN 
(d) OPNAVINST 

253/98
132/99
1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner's ADSD is 27 April 1993.

"A" SRB eligibility on 26 April 1999.

passed through zone
Reference (b) did not provide a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the
MA(OOO0)  rate at the time the petitioner passed through zone.
26
petitioner's EAOS at the time of passing through zone was 
October 1999.

The petitioner

b.

The petitioner reenlisted on 30 August 1999 for three

years to continue active service.

Reference

(c)

released on 30 April 1999 with an effective

listed a zone

"A" SRB entitlement for the

Reference (c) did not list a zones "B" and "C" for

dateCof  1 May 1999,
MA(OOO0)  rate.
SRB.

d.

Reference (d) provides an early SRB window during the

month of passing through zone, and, on or before the date of
passing through zone.
"A" window is 21 continuous months of active service to 6 years.

Additionally, per reference (c), the zone

e.

The petitioner requests to backdate the three year

reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and receive the
zone "A" SRB entitlement offered in reference (c).

f.

The petitioner is ineligible to receive the zone "A" SRB

entitlement,
to the release and the effective date of reference (c).

because she passed through the zone "A" window prior 

The

.

In view of the above,

2.
as is.

recommend the petitioner's record remain

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records
is returned.

(BCNR)

only.

Enclosure (1)

eenlistment

Incentives Branch

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00

    Original file (07339-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00

    Original file (03896-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00

    Original file (04291-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01

    Original file (01302-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA ā€œAā€ school training and receive the zone ā€œCā€ SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02

    Original file (06342-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99

    Original file (00280-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02927-01

    Original file (02927-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a However, d. Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present enlistment. The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A" "A" window of eligibility on 22 February However, the The member will Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO In view of the above, 2. remain as is. recommend the petitioner's record to This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for 3. the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02164-01

    Original file (02164-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 PERS-815 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 23 February 2001 to reflect 02 April 2001 and receive the zone B" SRB entitlement in reference (c).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07561-00

    Original file (07561-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2001. The requests to backdate the reenlistment of 09 November 2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement 2000 to 26 July offered in reference (b). November 1997 for three years and received a zone "A" SRB entitlement.