Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
Original file (08169-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 8 
20 March 2001

169-00

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 25 January 2001, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board concurred with paragraph 1. f.( 1) of the advisory

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAVY  l ERIOIWIL 

$720 

IltE6RltY  

COMMAND
DRIVE

YlLLlNDTOl 

TM 

3805 5-000 0

1160
PERS-815
25  Jan 01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

PERS-OOZCB

BCNR PETITION ICO

SNM'S  DD Form 149 dtd 15 Nov 00

(a) 
(b) OPNAVINST  
(c) NAVADMIN 

1160.6A
050/00

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend an alternative to the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on 21 July 1997 for three years
and received a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the HM(8483) rate/NEC.

b.

The petitioner reenlisted on 17 May 2000 for Three years
"A" SRB entitlement for the HM(8483) rate/NEC.

to receive a zone
The petitioner's EAOS at the time was 20 July 
Unfortunately,
by PERS-815 on 01 May 2000.

the petitioner received an erroneous SRB approval

2000.

C .

Per reference (b),

receive only one zone "A", one zone 
during a career.

service members reenlisting for SRB may

"B",  and one zone "C" bonus

/

d.

Reference (c) listed a zone

HM(8483) rate/NEC with an award level of 
petitioner reenlisted.

"B" SRB entitlement for the

Br5  at the time the
ISO

The petitioner

Per reference

e .

The petitioner's ADSD is 07 June 1994.

"B" window on 07 June 2000.

"B" window is from six to 10 years of active'

passed into the zone
(c),
service.

the zone

f.

The petitioner requests to received the zone "A" SRB

entitlement for the reenlistment of 

17 May 2000.

(1) The petitioner is not eligible to receive the zone "A"
The
SRB entitlement because he has received it once before.
petitioner is only eligible to receive a zone "B" SRB entitlement.

In view of the above,

2.
three year reenlistment of 17 May 2000.
reenlistment on 20 July 2000 for three to six years.
will entitle the petitioner to a zone "B" SRB with an award level
of 0.5 for the HM(8483) rate/NEC.

recommend expunging the petitioner's

Recommend effecting a

This change

Subj:

BCNR PETITION IC

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by

3.
the Board for correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.

(BCNR)

only.

Enclosure

Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00

    Original file (03896-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00

    Original file (08414-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99

    Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01

    Original file (02469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01

    Original file (04438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01

    Original file (00896-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00

    Original file (07339-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07561-00

    Original file (07561-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2001. The requests to backdate the reenlistment of 09 November 2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement 2000 to 26 July offered in reference (b). November 1997 for three years and received a zone "A" SRB entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00

    Original file (04291-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...