DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 2927-01
14 August 2001
This is in reference,, to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
l’&*lof the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 August 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 13 July 2001, a copy of which
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY
YILLI*DTOW
5720
PERSOWWEL COMMAND
IWTEDRITY DRIVE
TN
28055-0000
1160
PERS-815
13 Jul 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
PERS-OOZCB
BCNR PETITION
ICO
(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) OPNAVINST
132/99
1160.6A
28 Mar 01
(1) BCNR File
Encl:
1.
petitioner's request.
In response to reference (a),
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner discharged from active Navy service on 09
October 1989 after four years of total service.
separation rate and pay grade was
re-enlisted for active navy service on 23 February 2000 for four
years.
The petitioner
OS/E5.
The petitioner's
b.
Reference (b) listed-a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the
OS(OOO0) rate at the time the petitioner reenlisted for active
service.
enlistment contract of 23 February 2000 to reflect two years vice
four years and allow him the opportunity to reenlist without
monetary loss of SRB entitlement.
The petitioner requests to change his current
C .
Per reference (c),
service members that discharge from
active navy service from 24 hours to less than four years of
discharge maybe eligible for a broken service SRB entitlement.
The petitioner was discharge from active navy service for over 1
years.
broken service entitlement, but states his contract should have
reflected a lesser term for SRB purposes.
the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a
However,
d.
Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked
to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present
enlistment.
qualified for broken service SRB the member was properly advised
to re-enlist for four years.
knowing that the petitioner was not
Therefore,
e.
The petitioner is not eligible to change his current
contract to reflect two years vice four years.
petitioner's adjusted ADSD is
pass through the zone
2002.
SRB at that time.
23 February 1996.
The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A"
"A" window of eligibility on 22 February
However, the
The member will
Subj:
BCNR PETITION
ICO
In view of the above,
2.
remain as is.
recommend the petitioner's record to
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for
3.
the Board for correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.
(BCNR)
only.
the use by
Enclosure
.
_
eenlistment
Incentives Branch
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00844-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 29 May 1992 for four years to The petitioner's EAOS at the time of continue active service. reference (c), from 21 months the petitioner the zone of did not reenlist on 09 September 1993. continues service to six years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00935-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additiion, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08203-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was discharged from the Navy on 08 October 1993 after serving 2 years 08 months and 21 days of active service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05164-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner reenlisted on 25 September 2000 for four Reference (b) provides a zone OS(O304) rate/NEC at the time th e years to continue active service. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...