DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 7561-00
17 April 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 April 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 14 March 2001, a copy of
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
OEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY
5720
MILLINDTON
CIRSOWWIL COMMAND
INTEDRITY
DRIVL
II
D8055-0000
1160
PERS-815
14 Mar 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd
(b) OPNAVINST
(c) NAVADMIN
1160.6A
050/00
23
Ott 00
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner's ADSD is
27 July 1994.
The petitioner
passed through the zone
(b) listed a zone
petitioner passed through zone.
"A" SRB window on 26 July 2000.
Reference
"A" SRB entitlement for the CTA rate at the time
b.
C .
The petitioner reenlisted on 09 November 2000 for three
years to continue active service.
The requests to backdate the reenlistment of 09 November
2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement
2000 to 26 July
offered in reference (b).
b.
Reference (c) provides an early SRB window during the
month of passing through zone and on or before the date of passing
the petitioner reenlisted on 14
through zone.
November 1997 for three years and received a zone "A" SRB
entitlement.
SRB may receive only one zone "A", one zone
bonus during a career.
service members reenlisting for
Per reference (c),
Unfortunately,
"B", and one zone "C"
C .
eligibility,
before.
entitlement.
The petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB
because he received a zone "A" SRB entitlement once
Additionally,
reference (b) did not list a zone "B" SRB
In view of the above,
2.
as is.
recommend the petitioner's record remain
Subj:
BCNR PETITION
ICOt
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
3.
the Board for correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.
USN
MMC(SS)
Head,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03163-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released on 10 Reference (c) released on 02 d. The petitioner requests to backdated the 15 February 2001 to 13 January 2001 and receive the zone "B" SRB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01
Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.