Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05363-98
Original file (05363-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC

 

20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5363-98
11 May 1999

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 11 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER 
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130(33/064-99 of 30 March 1999, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

l

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

Y

S

WASHINGTON. DC 20350-200

0

IN REPLY   REFER 

T O

722 0
Ser 
30 Mar 99

N130C3/  064-99

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
FMR MBR

USN,

, 

(a) DODPM, Change 22, 

Dee 90

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#05363-98 w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the following recommendation concerning

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

The petitioner is requesting separation payment based on her

2.
Humanitarian Discharge (HUMS) on 30 DEC 88.

Per reference (a),  

para. 40413, a member who is discharged

3.
or released from active duty at his/her own request is not
entitled to separation pay.
(VSI) and special separation benefit (SSB) programs were not
implemented until after the enactment of the 1991 National
Defense Authorization Act.
not entitled to involuntary separation pay.

The voluntary separation incentive

A member who voluntarily separates is

Therefore,

N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's
4.
request for payment of separation pay upon her discharge (HUMS)
on 30 DEC 88.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05350-98

    Original file (05350-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. (1) BCNR Case File Record #05350-98 w/Microfiche Service Per your request, 1. enclosure (1) is provided. ADSW (23 DEC 91 from active duty on 30 SEP 92. entitled to involuntary separation The member only served 9 months and 11 days of - 30 SEP 92) when he was involuntarily...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03390-99

    Original file (03390-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 Y IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 20 DEC 99 N130C3/220- -99 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08786-98

    Original file (08786-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98

    Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04064-98

    Original file (04064-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786

    Original file (NC9808786.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99

    Original file (02246-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01601-98

    Original file (01601-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION Y S WASHINGTON. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting reimbursement of pay and 2 .