DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4064-98
9 February 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER
copy of which is attached.
N130C3/241-98 of 18 December 1998, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your
case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Direct
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
WASHINGTON. DC 20350-2000
LY REFER TO
NI30C3/2&gS
w3.5
Ser
18 DEC 98
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Subj:
Encl:
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#04064-98 w/Microfiche Service
Per your request,
1.
enclosure (1) is provided.
the following recommendation concerning
The petitioner is requesting compensation for 75 days of
2.
accrued leave that he was unable to use prior to his retirement
while assigned in a Limited Duty status (convalescent leave).
Upon verification of the petitioner's Master Military Account
3.
WMPA), it was noted that he had already sold 60 days LSL during
his career.
states that a member may only receive payment for a total of
sixty days accrued leave throughout a career, effective February
IO, 1976.
No Service Secretary waiver exists for this matter.
Public Law, U.S.C. Title 37,
ยง501 specifically
Head, Pay and Allowances
Section
(N130C)
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01601-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION Y S WASHINGTON. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting reimbursement of pay and 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02912-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06812-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting information on the 26 days 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08881-97
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 37, authority exists for U.S.C., Section 305a) and no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02615-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. retirement date not be never denied leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 14_50_26 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Evaluation Branch DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN REPLY REFER TO 1611 Ser...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...