D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC: tj
Docket No: 8786-98
22 June 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 7220 Ser N130C31109-99 of 3 June 1999, a copy
of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T OF THE N A V Y
O F F I C E O F T H E C H I E F O F N A V A L O P E R A T I O N S
W A S H I N G T O N . D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0
I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O
7220
Ser Nl3 0C3 /log-99
3 Jun R19
USN, -
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj :
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
FMR MBR-
Ref:
(a) SECNAVINST l9OO.7G
Encl :
(1) BCNR Case File #08786-98 w/Microfiche Service
Record
1. Per your request, the following recommendation concerning
enclosure (1) is provided.
The petitioner was paid half separation pay during his
scharge from active duty under honorable conditions on 25 SEP
. He is petitioning BCNR to change his entitlement from "half"
to "full" separation pay.
3. A review of the microfiche copy of his service record,
enclosure (I), revealed that the petitioner was not recommended
for reenlistment by his CO, and was discharged from active duty
due to weight control failure (SPD code 'JCR") on 25
SEP 95.
-
4. A member separated for weight control failure is
bldy
~ s s s t a n t Head, Pay and
Allowances Section (N130C)
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07664-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~ 1 3 0D1/ 148-99 11 AUG 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF - NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File # 07664-98 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny receive an Enlistment Bonus (EB) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03577-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 N130Dl/ 141-99 03 AUG 99 NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02898-99
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~130~1/132-99 19 JUL 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN USNR, Encl : BCNR File # 02898-99 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny Seaman...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00817-02
In atldition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or In this connection, the Board substantially conct~rrec-1 with the co~ii~nents contained in injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable niaterial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05081-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner was E-4 (frock to Second Class Petty Officer) for pay purposes...