Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01601-98
Original file (01601-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 
9 February 1999

1601-98

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER 
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N130C3/255-98 of 23 December 1998, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
been denied. The names and votes of
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has 
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

Y

S

WASHINGTON. DC 20350-200

0

IN 

-7720 REFER TO

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Encl:

(1)  BCNR Case

Record

File 

#01601-98 w/Microfiche Service

Per your request,

1 .
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

The petitioner is requesting reimbursement of pay and

2 .
allowances for accrued leave he did not use due to a short notice
IG inspection conducted prior to his retirement on

  31 Jan 98.

3.
Upon verification of the petitioner's Master Military Account
(MMPA), it was noted that he had already sold 60 days LSL during
his career.
U.S.C., Title 37,
receive payment for a total of sixty days accrued leave
throughout a career,
Secretary waiver exists for this matter.

N130C cannot recommend relief for the petitioner.

§501 specifically states that a member may only

effective February 10, 1976.

No Service

Head, Pay and Allowances

VW,”

Section 

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02912-98

    Original file (02912-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04064-98

    Original file (04064-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98

    Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08881-97

    Original file (08881-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 37, authority exists for U.S.C., Section 305a) and no...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08722-07

    Original file (08722-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2998. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful review of all the information brought forward, N130C recommends BCNR disapprove petitioners request for full pay and allowances for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786

    Original file (NC9808786.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03407-01

    Original file (03407-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3407-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title IJnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. 30 October 200 1 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05363-98

    Original file (05363-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The voluntary separation incentive A member who voluntarily separates is Therefore, N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's 4. request for...