Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98
Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 
30 March 1999

6905-98

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS 7220 Ser 
, a copy of which is
attached.

N130C3/034-99 11 March 1999 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMEN

OFFICE OF THE

T
  CHIE F
.

OF  THE NAV Y
OF NAVAL OPERATION
DC 20350-200
0

S

WASHINGTON

O

REPLY  REFER T

IN 
722 0
Ser 
11 Mar 99

N130C3/034-99

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

Ref:

Encl:

(a) MILPERSMAN 2650180
(b) DODFMR, Volume 7A

&

.4

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#06905-98 w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the following recommendation concerning

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

The petitioner reenlisted on  

2 .
from  his old EAOS  
accrued leave IAW reference (a).

(13Mar99), and did not qualify to sell back

lOSep98, more than 90 days away

A review of enclosure  

(l), revealed that the petitioner

3.
agreed to extend his old EAOS  
his projected rotation date (PRD) of  
however, reenlisted for 2 years on  
away from his EAOS) and did not qualify to sell back accrued
leave IAW references (a) and (b).

(13Dec97) for 15 months to match

lOSep98 (more than 90 days

The member,

13Mar99.

Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the

4.
petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight resulted in
his disqualification to sell back accrued leave during his
reenlistment on  
the petitioner's request to sell back 30

N130C does not recommend approval of
days accrued leave.

lOSep98.

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05447-03

    Original file (05447-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00

    Original file (08158-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04403-01

    Original file (04403-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4403-01 10 October 200 1 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03793-01

    Original file (03793-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04095-02

    Original file (04095-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Via: Subj: .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02418-01

    Original file (02418-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 270304.3 when delay en route and proceed time are authorized and used, the day of departure from the old station and the day of arrival at the new...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01601-98

    Original file (01601-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION Y S WASHINGTON. the following recommendation concerning The petitioner is requesting reimbursement of pay and 2 .