Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05350-98
Original file (05350-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 

NAVY  ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5350-98
11 May 1999

USN

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 11 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

13OC3/040-99  of 19 March 1999, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

 

.to

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
I

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

Y

S

WASHINGTON. DC 20350-200

0

O

IN REPLY REFER T
7220
N13 
OC3/ 
19 Mar 99

040-99

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
PNl(AW/SW)

USN,

(a) SECNAVINST 

1900.7G.

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#05350-98  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request,

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

The petitioner is requesting payment of Separation Pay upon

2 .
his involuntary separation on 30 SEP 92.

(l),

A review of enclosure  

3.
the Electronic Military Personnel Records System (EMPRS) service
record,
after his discharge on 24 FEB 89.
for special work  
SEP 92 due to military end strength reduction.

the petitioner joined the Naval Reserve on 11 MAY 90

(ADSW)  on 23 DEC 91 and released from ADSW on 30

and based on the information in

He was recalled to active duty

a reserve enlisted  

Per reference (a),

4 .
minimum of six years continuous active duty service immediately
prior to separation in order to be eligible for involuntary
separation pay.
ADSW (23 DEC 91  
from active duty on 30 SEP 92.
entitled to involuntary separation

The member only served 9 months and 11 days of
- 30 SEP 92) when he was involuntarily terminated

Therefore,

member must have a

the petitioner is not

Assistant Head, Pay and

Allowances Section (N130)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05363-98

    Original file (05363-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The voluntary separation incentive A member who voluntarily separates is Therefore, N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's 4. request for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02104-00

    Original file (02104-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to reinstate all pay and allowances due to a negative leave balance that occurred during the petitioner's continuation of active duty for special work orders with less than 24 hours...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08786-98

    Original file (08786-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06905-98

    Original file (06905-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) does not contain evidence to support the 4. petitioner's claim that an administrative oversight...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03390-99

    Original file (03390-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 Y IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 20 DEC 99 N130C3/220- -99 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06994-01

    Original file (06994-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your naval record and III addition, the Board considered the advisory nlemorandum 7220 Ser N 130C3/021.10071 of 2 I February 2002, a CNO After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07049-98

    Original file (07049-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his leave balance as of 1 October 1998 be credited with an additional 38 days of accrued leave ( he should have been in a temporary duty status from 8 March 1997 to 14 April 1997). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06851-98

    Original file (06851-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for 1995 and 1996. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 6851-98 MMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s...