Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99
Original file (02246-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAW ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 

MEH: tj 
Docket No:  2246-99 
7 July  1999 

This is  in  reference to  your application  for correction of  your  naval  record  pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the  United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member panel  of  the  Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on  7 July  1999.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice 
were  reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application,  together  with  all  material  submitted  in  support thereof,  your naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition,  the  Board  considered  the advisory 
opinion furnished  by  BUPERS  Memorandum  1160 PERS-815 of  21 June  1999, a copy of  which 
is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire  record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish  the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection,  the Board  substantially concurred  with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly,  your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will  be  furnished  upon  request. 

It is  regretted  that  the circumstances of  your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled  to  have  the  Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter  not  previously  considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to keep  in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correc!ion  of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable  material  error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BUREAU O F  NAVAL PERSONNEL 

5720 INTEGRITY  DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

IN REPLY  REFER TO 

1160 
PERS-815 
21 Jun 99 

MEMORANDUM  FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
Via: 

PERS-OOZCB 

 

~

Sub] :  BCNR PETITION I

-

.

O

C

USN, 

Ref: 

(a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 29 Mar  99 
(b) NAVADMIN 253/98 
(c) NAVADMIN  132/99 
(d) OPNAVINST ll60.6A 

Encl : 

(1.)  BCNR File 

1.  In response to reference  (a), recommend a disapproval to 
petitioner's  request. 

-  Petitioner executed a 29 month extension on 08 Jul 98 to 

obliserve for Bupers orders.  Petitioner's  EAOS at the time was 
02 Jun 90. 

-  Reference  (b), released on 20 Nov 98 with effective date of 

01 Dec 98, did not carry a zone "C"  SRB entitlement  for the 
AT(0000) the day petitioner  signed the 29 month extension. 

-  Petitioner requests to cancel the 29 month extension of 08 

Jul 98 and allow him to reenlist on 15 Apr 1999 and receive the 
zone "C"  SRB entitlement without monetary  loss of SRB 
entitlement.  However, reference  (b) was in effect at the time 
petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date. 

-  Petitioner rn*nlic+nA on 02 Jun ! Q Q 9   for  : .  years and 
received 59 months of a zone "C"  SRB entitlement of for the 
AT(0000) offered in reference  (c).  Reference  (c) was released on 
30 Apr  1999 with an effective date of 01 May 1999. 

-  Petitioner received his zone "C"  SRB entitlement paid out 

to his 16 year point of eligibility.  Per reference  (d) zone "CN 
eligibility is from 10 years active service to 14 years and pays 
up to the 16 year point. 

2.  In view of the above, recommend petitioner  record remain as 
is. 

3.  This is an advisory memorandum to reference  (a) for use by 
the Board for Correction of Naval Records  (BCNR) only.  Enclosure 
(1) is returned. 

Head 
Reenlistment Incentives Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99

    Original file (03289-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99

    Original file (03370-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99

    Original file (03422-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03873-99

    Original file (03873-99.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. - Petitioner requests to cancel the 4 month extension of 17 Ott 96 and the extension signed on 15 Jun 98 to allow him to receive an additional 42 months of zone "B" SRB entitlement. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99

    Original file (03281-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99

    Original file (00381-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 15_32_38 CST 2001

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98

    Original file (00332-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01

    Original file (01302-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA ā€œAā€ school training and receive the zone ā€œCā€ SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99

    Original file (00280-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...