DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC: ddj
Docket No: 3390-99
19 January 2000
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 January 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER
copy of which is attached.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
Your allegations of error and injustice
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N130(33/220-99 of 20 December 1999, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
N
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000
Y
IN REPLY REFER TO
722 0
Ser
20 DEC
99
N130C3/220-
-99
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
(a) SECNAVINST
,..
1900.7G
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#03390-99 w/Microfiche Service
Per your request, the following recommendation concerning
1.
enclosure
(1) is provided.
Enclosure (1) indicates a request for payment of full vice
2 .
half separation pay during his discharge from active duty due to
weight control failure on 16 JAN 99.
he was assigned an involuntary separation program designator
(SPD) code of
"Honorable" character of service on his separation.
"JGH" (non-retention on active duty) and an
His DD-214,
indicates that
The specific circumstances
3.
petitioner's discharge 16 JAN 99,
reference (a) for extraordinary instances.
the member's accomplishments during his career were noteworthy
and commendable,
does not qualify for full separation pay based upon the criteria
of his separation (weight control failure) IAW reference (a).
does not meet the definition of
While it is true that
(weight control failure) of the
N130C that the petitioner
it is the opinion of
,
Assistant Head, Pay and
Allowances Section
(N130C)
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08786-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02104-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to reinstate all pay and allowances due to a negative leave balance that occurred during the petitioner's continuation of active duty for special work orders with less than 24 hours...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01292-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 1292-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.