Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007778
Original file (20120007778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  11 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007778 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

The applicant defers to counsel.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests the applicant's record be corrected to show he was found medically unfit for duty, granted a physical disability retirement, and provided retroactive pay. 

2.  Counsel states the applicant was wounded in 2004 when his vehicle was hit by an improvised explosive device (IED).  He was not afforded a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) although he was treated for a number of problems while on active duty.  Initially, in 2011, he was granted a disability rating by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which was within 1 year of his date of release from active duty.  The VA granted him a 90 percent disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), lumbar strain, tinnitus, and post-traumatic headaches.  The applicant clearly warranted an MEB at the time of discharge.  The applicant appears to have slipped through the cracks 

3.  Counsel provides copies of the applicant's service medical records, VA medical records, and his 2011 VA rating decision.  


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 21 February 1998, the applicant enlisted in the delayed entry program.  On 1 September 1998, he enlisted in the Regular Army, completed the training requirements, and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman). 

3.  The service medical records provided by counsel contain the following facts, findings, and information. 

     a.  On 30 August 1999, the applicant sustained acoustic trauma when a mortar round exploded near him.  He was treated for bilateral tinnitus and given ear protection. 

     b.  Between August 1999 and 2004, the applicant was also treated for several conditions including vision correction, warts, rashes, upper respiratory infections, the flu, and a right knee problem. 

     c.  In April 2004, he was treated for constant low back pain (LBP) for 2 months and in June 2004 he was medically cleared for deployment.

     d.  The only medical record that is available for the date of the reported IED incident is a record that shows the applicant was treated for a cold, and this record is dated 3 November 2004.

     e.  On 12 December 2004 and again on 24 January 2005, he was treated for LBP.  He reported the pain was constant but on these dates it had worsened.


     f.  The applicant's post-deployment physical, dated 3 August 2005, shows the applicant complained of several problems and was referred for additional evaluation for a symptomatic TBI and LBP.

     g.  A Fort Carson, Colorado TBI Questionnaire indicates the applicant was involved in an incident, on 3 November 2004, when his vehicle was hit by two IEDs.  The applicant reported having headaches, dizziness, memory problems, ringing in the ears, and sleep problems.  Right after the incident, he reported that he still has headaches, memory, and sleep problems. 

4.  A Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 16 August 2005, shows the applicant had mild post-concussion syndrome, lumbago (an umbrella term for LBP), insomnia, and acute PTSD.

5.  The applicant's last Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER), ending in August 2005, shows he executed over 250 combat missions with outstanding results.  He also consistently scored 300 on the Army Physical Fitness Test and was rated among the best.

6.  At an undocumented point in 2005, but prior to separation, the applicant changed his last name from J____ to W____.

7.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 26 November 2005.  His 
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) provides the following:

* involuntarily extended on active duty (Stop Loss) for 396 days
* service in Kuwait/Iraq from 31 July 2004 through 17 March 2005
* his narrative reason for separation is listed as completion of required active service

8.  On 8 December 2011, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for injuries sustained on 3 November 2004 while assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment (Air Assault), United States Forces-Iraq.

9.  Prior to discharge, the applicant applied for VA benefits.  He has undergone several VA examinations and evaluations with ratings as follows:







Condition








Dates
1/06
8/06
8/07
3/08
5/09
12/09
3/10
7/11
PTSD
30%
NA
30%
50%
NA
NA
NA
50%
TBI
10%
NA
10%
10%
40%
NA
NA
40%
LBP/Lumbar Strain
10%
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
20%
Tinnitus
10%
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10%
Rosacea
NA
60%
NA
60%
0%
0%
NA
0%
Post-Traumatic Headaches
NA
NA
NA
NA
10%
NA
NA
10%
Right Knee
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10%
10%
Left Knee
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10%
10%
*NA-Not Addressed








10.  Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

11.  Title 38, USC, sections 310 and 331, permit the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered physically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.

12.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), provides that:

	a.  Disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and he can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. 

	b.  When a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, their continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that they were unable to perform their duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  On behalf of the applicant, counsel requests correction of the applicant's record to show he was medically unfit for duty, granted a physical disability retirement, and retroactive pay.

2.  The award of VA compensation does not mandate changing a discharge, nor does it demonstrate an inequity in a military disability rating.  The VA operates under its own policies and regulations and may determine that a medical condition warrants compensation.  The VA is not required to determine fitness for duty at the time of separation.  The Army must find an individual physically unfit before the individual can be medically retired or separated.  Furthermore, the VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agency's examinations and findings.  The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the policies of that agency.  It does not, in itself, establish physical unfitness for Department of the Army purposes.

3.  The applicant's current VA disability rating has little bearing on his medical condition as it was at the time of his separation and does nothing to overcome the presumption of fitness.

4.  The record does not contain any evidence and the applicant and/or counsel have not provided any evidence that shows the applicant was unable to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating at the time of discharge, or that his service was interrupted as a result of a physical disability.  In fact, his August 2005 NCOER indicates he was performing his duties quite well.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  __x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007778



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007778



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00623

    Original file (PD2010-00623.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful review of the evidence, the Board unanimously recommends that the tinnitus be given a TDRL rating of 10% for six months, and a permanent separation rating of 10%, IAW VASRD §4.124a and §4.87. X-rays of his knees were normal. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows: TDRL at 60% for six months following CI’s prior medical separation, and then a permanent combined 30% disability retirement as indicated below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007391

    Original file (20130007391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides and his record contains a DA Form 2173, dated 16 March 2005, wherein it shows he was treated as an outpatient at the military clinic in Iraq on 30 July 2004 for a right shoulder rotator cuff strain that occurred on or about 30 June 2004. The examining physician noted the applicant reported he continued to experience bilateral shoulder pain that increased with work activities. He stated he had been out of work and on disability since 2009.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00096

    Original file (PD2009-00096.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudged the PTSD, TBI, and Neural Hearing Loss to be unfitting for continued military service. PTSD Rating Recommendation . The most proximate source of comprehensive evidence on which to base the permanent rating recommendation in this case is an extrapolation from the MEB exam (6 mo pre-separation), the VA initial psychiatric rating evaluation (2 weeks pre-separation) and the VA PTSD review evaluation (21 months after separation) including VA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017026

    Original file (20140017026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile) * letter to the physical evaluation board (PEB) * service medical records * VA medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 13 July 2004, a medical evaluation board (MEB) diagnosed him with neck pain with cervical DDD and bilateral radiculopathy. The board's scope of review was limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00248

    Original file (PD2011-00248.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neurologic examination performed on December 3, 2004 was normal and he was ambulating without difficulty. However, the Board also noted residuals of frontal lobe injury not merely restricted to mild memory dysfunction that included problems other cognitive functions (decreased verbal processing, attention, and concentration), irritability, anger, and problems with impulse control reflected in neuropsychological testing and the initial VA mental health clinic encounter 9 months after...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00543

    Original file (PD2009-00543.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB considered the case, and found him unfit for continued military service due to Chronic Achilles Tendinosis. As noted above, the CI underwent MEB/PEB, and the Right Achilles Tendinosis (coded 5284) was rated at 10% disability. Based on that evaluation, the VA assigned a rating of 10% for Traumatic Brain Injury with Headaches (coded 8045-8100), 10% for Cognitive Disorder with Sleep Disorder (coded 8045-9304), and 10% for Tinnitus (coded 6260).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00262

    Original file (PD2011-00262.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the MEB exam, range-of-motion (ROM) was limited and painful. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00849

    Original file (PD2011-00849.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the right shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Both the PEB and VA rated the shoulder at 10%. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the chronic right knee pain; chronic LBP; OSA or neck pain contended conditions; and, therefore, no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00114

    Original file (PD2011-00114.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the injury he suffered from headaches and one isolated seizure in October 2004. The Board considered at length both the TDRL rating and the final rating recommendations at separation from the TDRL. The VASRD does allow for a 10% rating for the cranial defect and the Board, by simple majority, recommends addition of this condition as unfitting, coded 5296, with a 10% TDRL rating and a 10% final rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00847

    Original file (PD2011-00847.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this case the letter allows separate ratings for 1) post-concussive syndrome with subjective dizziness and memory and concentration problems; 2) headaches due to TBI; and 3) anxiety and depression due to TBI; rendering each in effect as separately unfitting conditions for purposes of the combined disability rating. A 10% rating for code 8045 was effective the day after the CI separated from service. While it is likely the CI did have PTSD while he was in service, there is no direct...