Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02202
Original file (PD-2014-02202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX        CASE: PD - 2014 - 0 2202
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE      BOARD DATE: 201 5 0303
Separation Date: 20080528


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 ( Security Forces Journeyman ) medically separated for a pulmonary thromboembolism condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requireme nts of his Air Force Specialty . He was placed on duty and mobility restrictions and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The pulmonary thromboembolism condition, characterized as “recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF)” w as forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus” as unfitting, rated 10%. Additionally the IPEB adjudicated the “paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as Category II (condition that can be unfitting but is not currently compensable or ratable). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB which changed the DVT condition rating to 0% and increased the atrial fibrillation condition to 10%. The CI appealed this decision to the Secretary of Air Force Personnel Council (SAF PC ) which changed the DVT condition to “ pulmonary thromboembolism” with a 0% rating and determined that the PAF d id not contribute to the CI’s unfitness and therefore, d id not warrant a disability rating. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Please Consider All Conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.







RATING COMPARISON :

Service Formal PEB – Dated 20080415
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Pulmonary Thromboembolism 6899-6817 0% Recurrent Venothromboembolic Disease 6817 60% 20080721
PAT Category II Atrial Fibrillation 7010 10% 20080721
Other x0
 Other x8
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 80%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090202 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : SAF PC coded the paroxysmal atrial tachycardia ( PAT ) condition as a Category II condition (“Conditions that can be unfit, but not compensable or ratable”) will be discussed below under the unfitting condition.

History of DVT and PE Requiring Lifelong Anticoagulation Condition . The CI was seen in a civilian emergency room ( ER ) with symptoms of some pleuritic pain with deep breathing and some bruising on the top of his foot and toes. There were physical exam findings of clear chest, and left leg tenderness in the popliteal fossa and in the lower posterior calf. A left leg ultrasound demonstrated a DVT involving the left popliteal vein. He was admitted and started on heparin (anticoagulant ) intravenously . The p ulmonologist noted that the CI denied any lengthy trips or prolonged periods of sitting and no specific left lower extremity injury. The examiner confirmed the physical exam findings of a clear chest and left popliteal tenderness and increased calf diameter. A ventilation perfusion scan was indeterminate for pulmonary emboli. The examiner opined that the CI had a left lower extremity DVT and his lung scan very likely reflected PE. The examiner further recommended a transition to Lovenox (an injectable anticoagulant for 5 days, then transition to Coumadin (an oral anticoagulant). The CI was seen in follow-up by the family practitioner who noted that the CI reported that the left leg was doing better and there was no pleuritic pain. There were physical exam findings of left calf mild tenderness in the posterior popliteal fossa. The examiner recommended that the CI could return to work with desk work only and to continue Coumadin and continue lab work to monitor Coumadin effectiveness. The Internal Medicine examiner in a m emo to the family practitioner examiner documented that the CI underwent a hypercoagulable workup in which all testing was negative. The CI continued to report decreased stamina with vigorous activity ( he would get more short of breath and worn out after approximately 30 minutes of basketball, whereas prior to his DVT/PE he could easily play for an hour ) . The left leg physical exam findings were normal. The examiner recommended 6 months of Coumadin with follow-up and the CI was given extensive education regarding DVT/PE. The CI was seen in the civilian ER on 24   February 2004 for chest pain. A chest X -ray performed in the ER was normal along with a normal bilateral lower extremity ultrasound . A lung scan performed the next day for difficulty breathing showed indeterminate PE while a chest CT scan showed left lower lobe pneumonia. The CI deployed and was seen in -t heater on 27 May 2007 for throbbing right calf pain for 2 weeks. The physical exam findings were right calf pain with compression. The examiner suspected DVT and the CI was med e vac'd to Lan d stuhl Army Medical Center ( LAMC ) for evaluation. The examiner at LAMC diagnosed a right lower lobe PE on CT scan and a right calf DVT and restarted the CI on Lovenox. The civilian h ematologist documented that the CI was asymptomatic with a normal physical exam. The examiner diagnosed recurrent venothromboembolic disease and noted that the CI was at “high risk for recurrent thrombosis without indefinite anticoagulation due to the unprovoked nature of both clots . ” The civilian c ardiologist documented the CI as asymptomatic with a normal physical exam. The examiner diagnosed recurrent DVT with pulmonary emboli . The examiner opined that the CI understood the “risk of recurrent DVT and PE is significant at his age and as he gets older . ” The civilian
p ulmonologist noted the diagnosis of recurrent PE and recommend ed more pulmonary testing. On 30 august 2007, t he CI was admitted to the hospital for the development of atrial fibrillation. An echocardiogram was negative for valvular hea t disease or cardiomyopathy. Electrocardiogram was suggestive of pericarditis and the CI did have a possible virus syndrome prior to admission. He was started on cardiac medication to control the atrial fibrillation. He had done very well since then and remained in sinus rhythm. The civilian c ardiologist documented that the CI had two spontaneous DVT s and PE with normal hyper-coagulopathy testing and that t he CI required lifelong Coumadin. The MEB narrative summary exam performed approximately 6 months prior to separation documented that the CI was previously evaluated by h ematology, c ardiology and p ulmonary s pecialists who recommended lifelong therapy with Coumadin given the “recurrent nature of his venothromboembolic disease . ” The MEB examiner filed a duty limiting condition report and stated that because the CI was on blood thinners, that he could not participate in any high risk activities that would predispose him to bleeding. The VA Compensation and Pension exam accomplished a lmost 2 months after separation documented that the CI continued on Coumadin and cardiac medications. The CI was asymptomatic and the physical exam findings for the chest and extremities were normal. The examiner diagnosed recurrent DVT/PE and atrial fibrillation secondary to the DVT/PE.
The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The SAF PC coded the pulmonary thromboembolism condition as 6899 analogous to 6817 ( Pulmonary Vascular Disease ) and rated at 0% (a symptomatic, following resolution of pulmonary thromboembolism ) with specific mention that treatment for the condition (continuous anticoagulant medication) and not the condition itself is what rendered the CI unfitting. The VA coded the condition as 6817 code (Recurrent Venothromboembolic Disease) rated at 60% for chronic pulmonary thromboembolism requiring anticoagulant therapy. It is well documented throughout the service treatment record that the CI had recurrent DVT/PE and required lifelong anticoagulation therapy. The VASRD criteria for the 0%, 30%, and 60% rating are copied below for the reader’s convenience:

Chronic pulmonary thromboembolism requiring anticoagulant therapy, or; following inferior vena cava surgery without evidence of pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular dysfunction…...... 60

Symptomatic, following resolution of acute pulmonary embolism……………………………………………….30

Asymptomatic, following resolution of pulmonary thromboembolism………………………………….……….0

There was no evidence of any residual pulmonary complications due to his recurrent PE and no evidence that suggest anything other than complete resolution of the PE. The evidence supports that the CI did not have any symptoms after resolution of his recurrent PE; therefore, he did not met the 30% rating criteria. Additionally, the evidence does not support that the CI had chronic pulmonary thromboembolism, evidence of pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, or inferior vena cava surgery as required for the 60% rating. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 0% for the pulmonary thromboembolism condition was appropriately recommended in this case.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the pulmonary thromboembolism condition and IAW VASRD §4.100a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended PAT condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting . There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

invalid font number 31502
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140429 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


SAF/MRB
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762


Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-02202.

After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency

Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00157

    Original file (PD2009-00157.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic, Persistent Deep Venous Thrombosis/Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism/Hypercoagulable State requiring chronic use of anticoagulants: The CI served in the U.S. Marine Corps between 1987 and 1991 on active duty. VA treatment records revealed that in January 2009, the CI was admitted for another pulmonary embolism. Either condition alone would require Coumadin use.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00663

    Original file (PD2011-00663.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the pulmonary scans and pulmonary hypertension were improving, the CI had continued shortness of breath and had a diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic disease. The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated primary hypercoagulable state, on lifelong anticoagulation condition as unfitting (with contributing category II chronic thromboembolic disease and venous stasis) and the CI was rated at 40% and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Exhibit C. Department of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00061

    Original file (PD2012-00061.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the hypercoagulable state due to May Thurner Syndrome referred to as recurrent left lower extremity DVT condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Table of Analogous Codes of 25 November 2008. The other requested Hypercoagulable State due to May Thurner Syndrome referred to as Recurrent Left Lower Extremity Deep Vein...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00561

    Original file (PD2011-00561.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) (PEB) adjudicated chronic anti-coagulation secondary to recurrent pulmonary embolism as unfitting (service incurred and/or aggravated), rated 0%, with application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and guidance from the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA). These are accordingly addressed below in addition to a review of the service rating for the unfitting chronic anti-coagulation secondary to recurrent pulmonary embolism...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00560

    Original file (PD2011-00560.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board concluded that the evidence of the record did not support rating using the code for pulmonary vascular disease as there were no duty limiting respiratory symptoms and no evidence of chronic or recurrent pulmonary embolism. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00559

    Original file (PD2009-00559.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no trophic skin changes or evidence of stasis dermatitis.” Diagnosis was “Postphlebitic syndrome, left lower extremity.” The VA (near entry into TDRL) used essentially the same exams and history as the military and rated the CI’s DVT-related conditions as 7121 (Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 10%, and 6817 (Bilateral Base Pulmonary Emboli Secondary to Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 60%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00685

    Original file (PD2009-00685.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI requests review of his “separation findings and conclude a 60% disability rating due to my chronic pulmonary thromboembolism requiring anticoagulant therapy.” He additionally lists his VA service connected rating for scoliosis as per the rating chart below. Treatment records (civilian and military) from March 2001 to the time of the MEB two years later reflected recovery and absence of recurrent blood clots or pulmonary emboli (pulmonary thromboembolism). Other PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01048

    Original file (PD2011-01048.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recurrent episodes of increased chest pain prompted evaluation for suspected recurrent pulmonary embolism in March 2000 and again in May 2001; however, pulmonary angiogram performed each time was negative for evidence of acute pulmonary embolism, chronic pulmonary embolism, or chronic pulmonary vascular disease. The evidence clearly establishes that, after the second pulmonary embolism in September 1999, the CI did not have recurrent or chronic pulmonary thromboembolism as specified in the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01176

    Original file (PD-2014-01176.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Repeat examination on 27 June 2004 also recorded that there was no edema of the lower extremities. On examination, the left calf and both thighs were tender to touch, and several distended veins were felt on the left lower calf and right upper thigh.A Coumadin Clinic encounter on 9 December 2005, recorded the CI experienced muscle pain when he overdid activities such as standing too long or playing basketball. The CI complained of edema of the lower extremities relieved with elevation on...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01058

    Original file (PD-2013-01058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DVT condition, characterized as “recurrent left lower extremity DVT,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “deep vein thrombosis, left lower extremity with pulmonary embolism (resolved)”as unfitting, rated 20%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs...