RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE
CASE NUMBER: PD100401 BOARD DATE: 20100728
SEPARATION DATE: 20060828
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was a E-5/Staff Sergeant, Vehicle Operations Craftsman medically separated from the Air Force in 2006 after 8 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was Low Back Pain. The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for the Back Condition, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations.
________________________________________________________________
CI CONTENTION: The CI states: “I am respectfully requesting a review of my discharge disability rating that I was assigned issued upon my discharge from the Air Force in August 2006. I was discharged as Honorable Disability with severance pay. As far as I can tell, I have no disability rating upon being discharged. I currently receive compensation from the VA with a rating of 40%. My medical discharge was due to my status post fusion (3 back surgeries 2004-2005) and degenerative Disc Disease. I believe that I should have been rated to retire when I was discharged. I tried to gain employment but failed. I have also been deemed disabled by Social Security. I have been paying back the VA for my severance pay since my original award date, and will be done re-paying in 2011. I have several service connected disabilities that can be found in VA Medical records, the three major ones are 40% status post fusion DDD, 50% PTSD anxiety disorder, and a pending compensation rating, VA confirmed diagnosis of a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). MY DDD has moved to my cervical spine C4, C6 and has caused nerve impingement, pain and an increase in migraines. There are current MRI’s on file at the Wichita VA that show significant scarring and damage to nerves in my lower back. I am requesting a review of my file and my discharge rating decision because I am only 30 years old and I have a long road ahead of me. --it is full of assorted therapies for my body and mind. I have been deemed disabled and unemployable by 2 different government agencies. I am asking for a fair and just rating to retire me please. I entered the Air Force at the age of 18, healthy and with every intention of making a career out of the Air Force. Thank you for all of your time and consideration.”
________________________________________________________________
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB | VA (Same Month as and 6 Months After Separation) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condition | Code | Rating | Date | Condition | Code | Rating | Exam | Effective |
Low Back Pain | 5241 | 10% | 20060714 | Low Back Pain | 5241 | 40% | 20060810 | 20060828 |
NARSUM | Surgical Scar Status Post Lumbar Laminectomy | 7804 | 10% | 20070208 | 20060828 | |||
Not in DES | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) | 9411 | 30% 50% |
20070208 20081028 |
20060828 20080829 |
|||
Not in DES | Tinnitus | 6260 | 10% | 20060817 | 20060828 | |||
Not in DES | Surgical Scar Anterior Abdominal Area | 7804 | 10% | 20070208 | 20060828 | |||
Not in DES | Allergic Rhinitis | 6522 | 0% | 20070608 | 20060828 | |||
TOTAL Combined: 10% | TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): 70% from 20060829 80% from 20080829 Individual Unemployability granted 20081230 |
________________________________________________________________
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Back Pain
The CI had a five year history of back pain and had three back surgeries. She had a Laminectomy and Discectomy at L4-5 and L5-S1 20040707, Revision Laminectomy and Discectomy at the same sites 20050112, and Spinal Fusion 20051108.
The CI's back pain initially started shortly after the birth of her son in March of 2000. While deployed she continued to have pain and it eventually worsened. In September 2003 she was referred to orthopedics and a complete work-up including X-rays, bone scans, and Magnetic Resonance Imagings (MRIs) documented degenerative disc disease as well as impingement of the nerves at the L4-L5 and L5-S1. She was treated with epidural steroid injections but had severe side effects including leg weakness and hives. The treatment was discontinued after two injections. When her pain continued she had her first surgery, laminectomy and discectomy at L4-5 and L5-S1 in July 2004. Her postoperative course was complicated by a seizure attributed to a reaction to nausea medication. Despite physical therapy, she continued to have symptoms after surgery and a revision was done in January 2005. She then moved to a new base and was evaluated by another orthopedic surgeon who recommended lumbar fusion. She saw another surgeon who also recommended the fusion and it was done in November 2005. She appeared to do well with physical therapy after surgery and returned to a four hour workday with a restrictive profile in February 2006. However she continued to have significant back pain and was not able to perform her regular duties or progress to work more than four hours a day.
As shown in the chart below, the CI’s thoracolumbar range-of-motion (ROM) was improved after her third surgery in November 2005. In April and May of 2006 she had near normal flexion on three exams performed by two different providers. This was three and four months prior to separation from service in August 2006. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination approximately six months after separation from service, her ROM was significantly more limited. It appears her condition worsened after she separated. Although the range of motion exams from April and May 2006 do not include all the measurements, flexion was consistently documented at slightly less than 90 degrees. The exams were done on separate days by two different providers. Also the measurements did show improvement over those done in 2004 and 2005.
However, the Board must rate her condition as it was when she separated from service. At the time of separation from service, more likely than not, her thoracolumbar flexion was less than 90 degrees but not 60 degrees or less based on the preponderance of evidence available.
Separated 20060828; surgery April 2004, January 2005, and November 2005; birth in Oct 2007
Thoraco-lumbar ROM | Normal | PT 20041029 | MEB 20050526 |
Progress Note 20060411 | NARSUM 20060503 |
PT 20060504 |
VA C&P 20070208 |
VA C&P 20090227 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flexion | 90 | 30 | 5 | About a little less than 90 | About 90 | Fingers to ankles | 20, pain at 18 (20) | 38, pain at 20 |
Extension | 30 | 15 | 0 | About 5 | 7, pain at 7 (5) | 20 pain | ||
Right Lateral Flexion | 30 | 30 | Not Measured | 9, pain at 6 (5) (Decreased to 6 with repeated motion) |
20 pain | |||
Left Lateral Flexion | 30 | 30 | Not Measured | 9, pain at 7 (5) | 25 pain | |||
Right Lateral Rotation | 30 | Able to rotate | No problems or increased pain | 16, no pain (15) | 25 pain | |||
Left Lateral Rotation | 30 | Able to rotate | No problems or increased pain | 20, no pain (20) | 25 pain | |||
Total | 240 | (95-205) | 70 | 135 | ||||
Guarding and muscle spasm | Antalgic gait | Ambulating with steady gait; tender to palpation; reflexes 2+; scar well healed; reflexes 2+; back pain 4/10 | Normal gait; no guarding or spasm; normal posture; motor 5/5 bilateral; motor 5/5 bilateral; decreased light touch and pinprick in LEFT: lat aspect of thigh and tip of great toe and RIGHT: tip of great toe; Reflexes 2+ bilateral | No increase in symptoms with repeated motion | ||||
§4.71a Rating | 0% | 10% | 40% |
Other Conditions
Surgical Scar Status Post Lumbar Laminectomy
No evidence this condition was unfitting. No interference with required duties. No duty restrictions attributable directly to this condition.
Other Conditions Not in the Disability Evaluation System (DES):
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); Tinnitus; Surgical Scar, Anterior Abdominal Area; and Allergic Rhinitis
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s back condition is most appropriately rated as 10% for 5241 Low Back Pain.
Although a VA C&P examination done six months after separation documented thoracolumbar range of motion (ROM) limited to a compensable level, the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that prior to separation from service the CI’s ROM limitation, more likely than not, was less than the minimal compensable level. It appears that her condition worsened after she separated. However, VASRD §4.59 Painful Motion notes that the intent of the schedule is to recognize painful motion with joint or periarticular pathology as productive of disability. It is the intention to recognize actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joints, due to healed injury, as entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint. Therefore a 10% rating should be applied.
The Board also considered the condition of Surgical Scar Status Post Lumbar Laminectomy and unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no disability rating is applied. This condition did not interfere with performance of any required duties and no duty restrictions were attributable to this condition.
The other diagnoses rated by the VA (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); Tinnitus; Surgical Scar, Anterior Abdominal Area; and Allergic Rhinitis) were not mentioned in the Disability Evaluation System (DES) package and are therefore outside the scope of the Board. The CI retains the right to request her service Board of Correction for Military Records (BCMR) to consider adding these conditions as unfitting.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20100407, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
Deputy Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAF/MRB
1535 Command Drive, Suite E-302
Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002
Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Section 1554, 10 USC), PDBR Case Number PD-2010-00401.
After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation with severance pay.
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.
Sincerely
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings
cc:
SAF/MRBR
Whichita VFW
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01769
RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00684
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that the CI’s back condition most nearly approximated the 40% rating IAW the VASRD general rating formula for spine diseases, thoracolumbar flexion 30° or less. The Board thus has no basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00147
The medical basis for the separation was a back condition. Those two conditions with Low Back Pain account for 100% of my pain.’ She correlates these conditions with anthrax immunization on active duty. In the matter of all of the CI’s other medical conditions; the Board does not recommend a finding of unfit for additional rating at separation.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00433
The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of service rating and fitness determinations at separation, as elaborated above. In the matter of the lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously recommends a service disability rating of 20%,...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00496
The CI was referred to the PEB, determined unfit for the condition, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy, Marine Corps and Department of Defense regulations. Flex0-90105 (90)6090Ext0-30NE35 (30)30R Lat flex0-30252530L lat flex0-30302530R rotation0-3060 (30)40 (30)30L rotation0-3060 (30)40 (30)30COMBINED240200-235200240Notes:DTR’s equal; All Waddells negative; no mention of neurologic examNeurologically...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01312
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20080818 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201312 BOARD DATE: 20130214 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (42A10/Human Resources Specialist), medically separated for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine with back pain status post (s/p) L5-S1 decompression L2-L5,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00226
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the lumbar fusion L2-L3 condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Lumbar Fusion L2-L3 Condition . In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individuals’ records not be corrected to reflect a change in...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00089
The examiner’s summary of ROMs in the chart above was from the physical exam section of the C&P exam and was slightly different than the summary area ROMs (no ratable difference), which stated, “Loss of flexion of 22 degrees, extension of 10 degrees, left lateral flexion of 15 degrees and right lateral flexion of 10 degrees.” Although remote from separation, the Board noted that four subsequent VA exams at 38, 55, 77, and 87 months post-separation showed significantly greater ROM deficits...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00725
During the MEB exam on 5 June 2002 five months prior to separation the CI still complained of occasional back pain, some pain in his left foot, occasional left leg pain, and left lower leg numbness. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5295, IAW VASRD 4.71a. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00467
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued military service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating XXXXXXXXXX be corrected to show that the diagnoses in her...