RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: army
CASE NUMBER: PD0900078 COMPONENT: regular
BOARD DATE: 20090714 SEPARATION DATE: 20041109
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an E-5 watercraft engineer medically separated from the Army in 2004. The medical basis for the separation was history of low back pain (LBP) with resolved non-pain radicular findings. CI injured his back during physical training and underwent multiple back surgeries in 1992, 1996 and 1999. Despite back surgeries, physical therapy, injections, and an implanted spine stimulator, CI had continued back pain and radicular symptoms. CI was referred to the PEB, found unfit and placed on TDRL for his radicular symptoms (loss of strength and sensation) using coding for bilateral sciatic radiculopathy (8599-8520). CI’s final TDRL reevaluation in 2004 showed resolution of objective radicular findings and CI was separated at 10% under code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome) for back tenderness. The VA rated CI’s back condition at 60% (under the VASRD in effect in 2001, code 5293 intervertebral disc syndrome) and also rated his tender back surgical scar at 10% for a combined 60% rating. The CI contends for a higher rating due to LBP and radiculopathy. CI states ‘Original findings looked at my neurological problems from my back condition in my lower extremities (bilateral). The second findings did not take into account my neurological problems only my loss of range of motion. The president referred to VASRAD during the hearing without taking it into consideration.’
________________________________________________________________
COMPARISON OF VA AND DISABILITY RATINGS: The Army PEB rated CI at 10% (5243 intervertebral disc syndrome) for back tenderness without spasm or objective signs of radiculopathy on 20040923. The VA rated CI’s back at 60% for herniated disc surgery with loss of motion and radiculopathy with nerve stimulator implant, using code 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) based on an exam in 2002, early in CI’s TDRL period. There is no evidence of a more recent VA back examination or re-rating for that condition.
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. While on TDRL, CI continued treatment for his back condition with the VA included epidural steroid injections and relocation of his implanted nerve stimulator. CI’s pain level had decreased from 8-9 to 5-7 on a daily basis. He continued to experience less severe parasthesias and pain in both legs with normal motor and sensory exams. The final TDRL NARSUM references prior TDRL evaluations from the same provider. There were comprehensive lumbosacral (LS) range of motion (ROM) measurements performed during CI’s final TDRL evaluation that were not mentioned in the NARSUM. LS AROM showed flexion limited by pain at 20 degrees, and passive ROM flexion limited by pain: with guarded endpoint at 38 degrees. Since there was no mention of mechanical limit to LS ROMs, the Board opined that the PEB applied the DoDI and Army pain rule and did not rate CI on his pain-limited ROMs.
VASRD code 5243 Intervertebral disc syndrome uses the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. Application of the VASRD includes LS ROM endpoints due to pain. The rating formula specifically lists ‘forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine 30 degrees or less’ as a single criterion sufficient to rate 40%. Symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease is included in the general rating. The Board unanimously voted to rate CI’s back condition and pain-limited LS ROM under VASRD code 5243 at 40%.
________________________________________________________________
RATIONALE: The Army pain rule and DoDI 1332.39 language for a similar back code, stating ‘Demonstrable pain on spinal motion associated with positive radiographic findings shall warrant a 10 percent rating’ limited the PEB from rating CI’s non-mechanical LS ROM endpoints above 10%. Absent these rules, CI’s pain-limited LS flexion of 20 degrees meets the 40% criteria.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that CI’s prior separation be recharacterized to reflect that rather than discharge with severance pay, the CI was permanently retired by reason of physical disability with a 40% rating as indicated below.
Unfitting Condition | VASRD Code | Rating |
---|---|---|
HNP L4-S1 S/P DISCECTOMY WITH LOSS OF MOTION AND PAINFUL RADICULOPATHY | 5243 | 40% |
COMBINED | 40% |
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20091104, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veteran's Affairs Treatment Record.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02022
The Informal PEB adjudicated LLE radiculopathy and low back pain (LBP) as unfitting rated at 20% and 10% respectively. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB’s adjudication for the left leg radiculopathy condition upon entry into TDRL.With regards to the permanent rating recommendation,Board members considered and agreed that during TDRL, the...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00218
The condition was determined to be medically unacceptable and the CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Additional 5 degrees loss ROM with repeated motion; 5/5 motor; negative straight leg raise; decrease in sensation to pinprick and light touch on left leg and great...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01336
Pre -Separation) All Effective Date 20030416 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Back Pain & Loss of Motion 5293-5299- 5292 20% S/p Laminectomy L4-5, L5-S1 5293-5292 40% 20030205 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. At the MEB exam, the NARSUM, 24 October 2002, noted gradual improvement of pain, but with persistent difficulties with bending, stooping, lifting and running. The MEB physical exam noted that the general physical examination is within normal limits. The NARSUM...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00525
CI CONTENTION : The CI states: ‘VA rated disability at 40% Service connection on May 28, 1997 and considered me unemployable on 4-22-04 for the back condition military discharged me with at 10%. Follow-up for back pain. The frequency and severity of the CI’s back pain and radicular pain increased significantly during his time on TDRL and this was consistent with the increasing severity of degenerative disc disease and herniated discs with impingement on the right S1 nerve root documented...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020
Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00683
RATING COMPARISON: Service IPEB – Dated 20030408 Code Condition 5293‐5299‐ Back Pain secondary to 5295 HNP w/o radicular signs ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 10% Rating 10% RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW VA (2 Mos. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, unanimously recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Back Pain Secondary to HNP w/o Radicular Signs VASRD...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00843
It also noted the CI had only one or two days a week without any back pain. Evaluate intervertebral disc syndrome (preoperatively or postoperatively) either on the total duration of incapacitating episodes over the past 12 months or by combining under § 4.25 separate evaluations of its chronic orthopedic and neurologic manifestations along with evaluations for all other disabilities, whichever method results in the higher evaluation. However, if codes 5292 or 5295 are used, the back pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00038
The VA also separately rated a left leg radiculopathy, symptoms of which were noted in the DES file. This Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation, and whether radiculopathy should be recommended as a separately unfitting condition. Other Conditions .
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00746
Low Back Condition. The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the low back condition, but used the 2002 Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for rating the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation. The VA’s original rating decision coded 5293-5241 analogous to the new §4.71 VASRD code 5241 (Spinal fusion) utilizing the old spine code 5293 (Intervertebral disc syndrome) for a 20% rating for moderate limitation of motion of the lumbar spine.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00811
“Chronic low back pain with left leg radiculopathy s/p L4-5 diskectomy” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated the chronic back pain condition as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting addition of any lower extremity radiculopathy as an unfitting condition for...