RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201020 SEPARATION DATE: 20020905 BOARD DATE: 20130130 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (77F20/Petroleum Supply Specialist), medically separated for chronic low back(LBP) pain without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms. Her back pain began in March of 2000 without any traumatic event. It has persisted as a constant dull pain without radiation, weakness or numbness. Despite physical therapy (PT), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxers the CI could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the LBP condition as unfitting, rated 10% with specified application of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. CI CONTENTION: “It should be checked for errors, accuracy & fairness.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The CIs chronic LBP condition as requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. RATING COMPARISON: Service IPEB – Dated 20020703 VA (1 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. Residuals Scar S/P Bunionectomy, 1st Metatarsal Lt Foot 7804 10% 20021010 Bunion 1st Metatarsal Lt Foot S/P Bunionectomy, Long Arm Chevron 5299-5280 10% 20021010 Not Service-Connected x 2 20021010 Combined: 10% Combined: 40% VARDs in 2006, 2010 and 2011 continued 5293 rating at 20%. ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. The 2002 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding criteria for code 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome), and then to the current §4.71a rating standards in September 2003. The applicable 2002 standards in this case for code 5293 included radicular pain rather than incapacitating episodes. The older spine ratings were based on range-of-motion (ROM) impairment which was subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, whereas the current standards specify rating thresholds in degrees of ROM impairment. The older spine ratings also did not have the general spine rating formula provision of including pain (whether or not it radiates). For the reader’s convenience, the 2002 rating codes under discussion in this case are excerpted below. 5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar: Severe........................................................................................40 Moderate...................................................................................20 Slight..........................................................................................10 5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar: Severe.......................................................................................40 Moderate..................................................................................20 Slight.........................................................................................10 5293 Intervertebral disc syndrome: Pronounced; with persistent symptoms compatible with sciatic neuropathy with characteristic pain and demonstrable muscle spasm, absent ankle jerk, or other neurological findings appropriate to site of diseased disc, little intermittent relief..........................................................................................60 Severe; recurring attacks, with intermittent relief.................40 Moderate; recurring attacks.....................................................20 Mild............................................................................................10 Postoperative, cured....................................................................0 5294 Sacro-iliac injury and weakness: 5295 Lumbosacral strain: Severe; with listing of whole spine to opposite side, positive Goldthwaite's sign, marked limitation of forward bending in standing position, loss of lateral motion with osteoarthritic changes, or narrowing or irregularity of joint space, or some of the above with abnormal mobility on forced motion.....................................................................40 With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in standing position......................................................................20 With characteristic pain on motion..........................................10 With slight subjective symptoms only........................................0 The CI suffered from chronic LBP which began about 30 months prior to separation and was treated conservatively. X-rays of the lumbosacral spine were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the LS spine showed a minimal broad based disc bulge with associated central protrusion (L5), without significant displacement of the thecal sac, neural foraminal narrowing or nerve root impingement evident. Service treatment records (STRs) indicated diagnoses during treatment of lumbosacral strain, chronic LBP prior to MRI, but chronic LBP secondary to herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) (herniated disc) after MRI. A pain specialist assessment stated “Lumbar radiculopathy” and “positive findings of a bulge on the MRI (L4-L5).” STRs contain PT notes that documented some episodes of back pain with muscle spasm, as well as acute care visits for back pain for which the CI was prescribed muscle relaxants. The CI had an epidural injection for back pain. A neurosurgical opinion did not recommend surgery. A repeat MRI was done about a year prior to separation which was unchanged from the first MRI. A permanent profile was issued when there was no improvement despite recommended treatments of medication, PT, referral to a pain specialist and epidural injection. At the MEB exam, about 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported a constant, dull LBP with radiation and tingling in both lower extremities. The MEB exam noted “the back demonstrates full range of motion, flexion and extension”. Other exam findings were no tilt; slow gait, but no limp; tenderness to palpation of the lumbar spine; normal strength and sensation in all four extremities; and negative straight leg raise (SLR) bilaterally. The narrative summary (NARSUM) stated “Further evaluation included…MRIs of the lumbar spine in May 2001 and September 2001 which failed to show any disk herniation.” MRI impression was “minimal broad-based bulge with associated central protrusion at the L5 level.” The NARSUM also noted that there was an electromyogram (EMG) (electrophysiological test) performed “without any evidence of radiculopathy by exam.” The present condition and functional status noted “Pain is also aggravated by intercourse, running, bending, stooping, lifting grocery bags, lifting her 2-year- old child or rotational motion to her low back.” The diagnosis was chronic LBP and the examiner gave a “Pain Rating: Pain according to pain rating scale is constant and moderate.” At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, about a month after separation, the CI reported constant LBP with numbness and tingling in her legs, mainly the right leg. The history states that “Both of the magnetic resonance imaging scans show a bulging disk at L4-L5.” She was not taking any medication. The exam demonstrated normal spinal curvature without spasms. The examiner stated “She has knee buckling tenderness to very light palpation of the low lumbar region in the midline and to the right.” The lumbosacral spine had extension to 35 degrees, flexion to 85 degrees, left lateral bending to 35 degrees, and right lateral bending of 30 degrees, with pain. Muscle strength and deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) were normal and straight leg testing (SLR) was negative bilaterally. Sensation was noted as “subjective sense of decreased sensation circumferentially in a stocking distribution involving the entire right leg.” The examiner noted that the CI had a herniated disc by history with radiculopathy which was non-physiologic. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated “chronic low back pain without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms on repeated examinations, with characteristic pain on motion” as code 5299-5295 (lumbosacral strain) at 10%. The VA rated lower back condition with bulging disc at L4-L5 and radiculopathy as 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) at 20%. Based on the evidence in the STRs the CI had chronic LBP that had recurrent episodes. At times there was muscle spasm noted, at other times there was mild evidence of neurological involvement (radiculopathy). At the MEB exam there was constant pain noted. At the VA exam constant pain and pain on motion was noted. Neither of these exams noted muscle spasm. The VA exam included subjective complaints of paresthesis in the both legs worse on the right. There were no fixed peripheral nerve deficits on exam, although there were numerous treatment record entries and complaints of radicular pain and paresthesias. The CIs back pain behaved clinically like an intervertebral disc syndrome, with chronic back pain with acute exacerbations involving muscle spasm and lower extremity paresthesias at times. The Board therefore considered rating analogously to 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) and deliberated on if the record more closely approximated moderate recurring attacks (20%) or mild symptoms (10%). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board majority recommends that the CIs chronic LBP is appropriately rated as code 5299-5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) at 20%. BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DODI 1332.39 and AR 635-40 for rating the chronic LBP condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5293 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The dissenting voter (who recommended no change in the PEB’s 10% rating coded 5299-5295) did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5293 20% COMBINED 20% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120722, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130007444 (PD201201020) 1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final. 2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum. 3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards)