RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1201020 SEPARATION DATE: 20020905
BOARD DATE: 20130130
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (77F20/Petroleum Supply Specialist),
medically separated for chronic low back(LBP) pain without neurologic abnormality or
documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms. Her back pain began in March of 2000
without any traumatic event. It has persisted as a constant dull pain without radiation,
weakness or numbness. Despite physical therapy (PT), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) and muscle relaxers the CI could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical
requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards.
She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The
MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB
adjudicated the LBP condition as unfitting, rated 10% with specified application of Department
of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals, and was
medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: It should be checked for errors, accuracy & fairness.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The CIs chronic LBP condition as requested
for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and is
addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise
outside the Boards defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB Dated 20020703
VA (1 Mos. Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020906
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain
w/out Neurologic
Abnormality
5299-5295
10%
Lower Back Condition with
Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and
Radiculopathy
5293
20%
20021010
.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries.
Residuals Scar S/P
Bunionectomy, 1st Metatarsal Lt
Foot
7804
10%
20021010
Bunion 1st Metatarsal Lt Foot
S/P Bunionectomy, Long Arm
Chevron
5299-5280
10%
20021010
Not Service-Connected x 2
20021010
Combined: 10%
Combined: 40%
VARDs in 2006, 2010 and 2011 continued 5293 rating at 20%.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. The 2002 Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating
Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time
of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding criteria for code 5293
(intervertebral disc syndrome), and then to the current §4.71a rating standards in September
2003. The applicable 2002 standards in this case for code 5293 included radicular pain rather
than incapacitating episodes. The older spine ratings were based on range-of-motion (ROM)
impairment which was subject to the raters opinion regarding degree of severity, whereas the
current standards specify rating thresholds in degrees of ROM impairment. The older spine
ratings also did not have the general spine rating formula provision of including pain (whether
or not it radiates). For the readers convenience, the 2002 rating codes under discussion in this
case are excerpted below.
5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar:
Severe........................................................................................40
Moderate...................................................................................20
Slight..........................................................................................10
5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar:
Severe.......................................................................................40
Moderate..................................................................................20
Slight.........................................................................................10
5293 Intervertebral disc syndrome:
Pronounced; with persistent symptoms compatible with sciatic
neuropathy with characteristic pain and demonstrable muscle
spasm, absent ankle jerk, or other neurological findings
appropriate to site of diseased disc, little intermittent
relief..........................................................................................60
Severe; recurring attacks, with intermittent relief.................40
Moderate; recurring attacks.....................................................20
Mild............................................................................................10
Postoperative, cured....................................................................0
5294 Sacro-iliac injury and weakness:
5295 Lumbosacral strain:
Severe; with listing of whole spine to opposite
side, positive Goldthwaite's sign, marked limitation
of forward bending in standing position,
loss of lateral motion with osteoarthritic
changes, or narrowing or irregularity of joint space,
or some of the above with abnormal mobility
on forced motion.....................................................................40
With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending,
loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in
standing position......................................................................20
With characteristic pain on motion..........................................10
With slight subjective symptoms only........................................0
The CI suffered from chronic LBP which began about 30 months prior to separation and was
treated conservatively. X-rays of the lumbosacral spine were normal. Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) of the LS spine showed a minimal broad based disc bulge with associated central
protrusion (L5), without significant displacement of the thecal sac, neural foraminal narrowing
or nerve root impingement evident. Service treatment records (STRs) indicated diagnoses
during treatment of lumbosacral strain, chronic LBP prior to MRI, but chronic LBP secondary to
herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) (herniated disc) after MRI. A pain specialist assessment
stated Lumbar radiculopathy and positive findings of a bulge on the MRI (L4-L5). STRs
contain PT notes that documented some episodes of back pain with muscle spasm, as well as
acute care visits for back pain for which the CI was prescribed muscle relaxants. The CI had an
epidural injection for back pain. A neurosurgical opinion did not recommend surgery. A repeat
MRI was done about a year prior to separation which was unchanged from the first MRI. A
permanent profile was issued when there was no improvement despite recommended
treatments of medication, PT, referral to a pain specialist and epidural injection.
At the MEB exam, about 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported a constant, dull LBP with
radiation and tingling in both lower extremities. The MEB exam noted the back demonstrates
full range of motion, flexion and extension. Other exam findings were no tilt; slow gait, but no
limp; tenderness to palpation of the lumbar spine; normal strength and sensation in all four
extremities; and negative straight leg raise (SLR) bilaterally. The narrative summary (NARSUM)
stated Further evaluation included
MRIs of the lumbar spine in May 2001 and September
2001 which failed to show any disk herniation. MRI impression was minimal broad-based
bulge with associated central protrusion at the L5 level. The NARSUM also noted that there
was an electromyogram (EMG) (electrophysiological test) performed without any evidence of
radiculopathy by exam. The present condition and functional status noted Pain is also
aggravated by intercourse, running, bending, stooping, lifting grocery bags, lifting her 2-year-
old child or rotational motion to her low back. The diagnosis was chronic LBP and the
examiner gave a Pain Rating: Pain according to pain rating scale is constant and moderate.
At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, about a month after separation, the CI
reported constant LBP with numbness and tingling in her legs, mainly the right leg. The history
states that Both of the magnetic resonance imaging scans show a bulging disk at L4-L5. She
was not taking any medication. The exam demonstrated normal spinal curvature without
spasms. The examiner stated She has knee buckling tenderness to very light palpation of the
low lumbar region in the midline and to the right. The lumbosacral spine had extension to 35
degrees, flexion to 85 degrees, left lateral bending to 35 degrees, and right lateral bending of 30
degrees, with pain. Muscle strength and deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) were normal and straight
leg testing (SLR) was negative bilaterally. Sensation was noted as subjective sense of
decreased sensation circumferentially in a stocking distribution involving the entire right leg.
The examiner noted that the CI had a herniated disc by history with radiculopathy which was
non-physiologic.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB rated chronic low back pain without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic
paravertebral muscle spasms on repeated examinations, with characteristic pain on motion as
code 5299-5295 (lumbosacral strain) at 10%. The VA rated lower back condition with bulging
disc at L4-L5 and radiculopathy as 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) at 20%. Based on the
evidence in the STRs the CI had chronic LBP that had recurrent episodes. At times there was
muscle spasm noted, at other times there was mild evidence of neurological involvement
(radiculopathy). At the MEB exam there was constant pain noted. At the VA exam constant
pain and pain on motion was noted. Neither of these exams noted muscle spasm. The VA
exam included subjective complaints of paresthesis in the both legs worse on the right. There
were no fixed peripheral nerve deficits on exam, although there were numerous treatment
record entries and complaints of radicular pain and paresthesias. The CIs back pain behaved
clinically like an intervertebral disc syndrome, with chronic back pain with acute exacerbations
involving muscle spasm and lower extremity paresthesias at times. The Board therefore
considered rating analogously to 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) and deliberated on if the
record more closely approximated moderate recurring attacks (20%) or mild symptoms (10%).
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable
doubt), the Board majority recommends that the CIs chronic LBP is appropriately rated as code
5299-5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) at 20%.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
reliance on DODI 1332.39 and AR 635-40 for rating the chronic LBP condition was operant in
this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the
matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends a disability rating
of 20%, coded 5299-5293 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The dissenting voter (who recommended no
change in the PEBs 10% rating coded 5299-5295) did not elect to submit a minority opinion.
There were no other conditions within the Boards scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain
5299-5293
20%
COMBINED
20%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120722, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130007444 (PD201201020)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Boards recommendation to modify the individuals disability rating to 20%
without recharacterization of the individuals separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01090
The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. No evidence of spondylolysis or pars defect.”At the MEB medical examination...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00843
It also noted the CI had only one or two days a week without any back pain. Evaluate intervertebral disc syndrome (preoperatively or postoperatively) either on the total duration of incapacitating episodes over the past 12 months or by combining under § 4.25 separate evaluations of its chronic orthopedic and neurologic manifestations along with evaluations for all other disabilities, whichever method results in the higher evaluation. However, if codes 5292 or 5295 are used, the back pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01541
The chronic LBP condition, characterized as mechanical low back pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5295 10% Spondylosis of the Lumbosacral Spine 5295 10% 20020226 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x N/A Combined: 10% Combined: 10% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Chronic Low Back Pain Condition: The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), dated 03 May 2001, 5 months prior to...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01336
Pre -Separation) All Effective Date 20030416 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Back Pain & Loss of Motion 5293-5299- 5292 20% S/p Laminectomy L4-5, L5-S1 5293-5292 40% 20030205 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. At the MEB exam, the NARSUM, 24 October 2002, noted gradual improvement of pain, but with persistent difficulties with bending, stooping, lifting and running. The MEB physical exam noted that the general physical examination is within normal limits. The NARSUM...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00117
Spine surgery evaluation concluded there was no indication for surgery.The MEB physical examination on29January 2002 (DD Form 2808) recorded “ROM 45 degrees anterior flexion” but did not specify whether this was lumbar spine or trunk motion.The orthopedic MEB narrative summary addendum examination on30March 2002, recorded back flexion with fingers reaching to mid shin (approximately 70 degrees), similar to the physical therapy examination the year previously.There was tenderness to palpation...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02574
SEPARATION DATE: 20050508 Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain due to Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease…5299-524220%Paravertebral Muscle Spasms…5293-529240%VA PN*Right Leg Radiculopathy…5293-852010%VA PN*No Additional MEB/PEB Entries in Scope Combined: 60%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050826. Muscle strength in the bilateral lower extremity was normal and sensory examination recorded decreased pinprick sensation in the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01162
The lumbar spine condition, characterized as “lumbar degenerative disc disease and spondylolysis with low back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. CI CONTENTION : “ At the time of my evaluation it was determined that I had several problems with my lower back. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00462
The Board first considered the MEB and C&P examinations. The examination documented a normal ROM, normal neurological examination, a well healed scar, and absence of spasm. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00761
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200761 SEPARATION DATE: 20020116 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard Soldier, SGT/E‐5 (45E, assigned to a Hull Systems Mechanic slot, 63E), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) accompanied by neck pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01054
Low Back Pain Condition . The initial VA exam closest to separation had ROMs consistent with the subsequent VA exams, however, there was some decreased probative value as exams prior to it and following it demonstrated an absence of left ankle reflex and the neurologic exam was limited to “normal” without further details. Board deliberations focused on rating under 5292 (limitation of motion) of 20% (moderate) or 40% (severe); or under 5293 at 20% (moderate; recurring) or 40% (severe,...