Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00003
Original file (PD2009-00003.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY

CASE NUMBER: PD0900003 COMPONENT: ACTIVE

BOARD DATE: 20090604 SEPARATION DATE: 20070915

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an active duty officer medically separated from the Army in 2007. The medical basis for the separation was a back condition and ankle injury. He had an onset of back pain with disc problems in 2005, and underwent a surgical fusion in 2006. His ankle was fractured during prior service in 1993, with chronic complications requiring surgery in 2001. Both conditions were prohibiting his required duties, warranting a medical board in 2007. He was referred to the PEB, found unfit for both conditions and separated at 20% disability (10% each condition). A VA exam within four months of separation resulted in 20% ratings for each condition. Mr. Erikson contends that both of the PEB ratings were too low, citing the significant impact on his lifestyle and earning ability and noting the continuing need for an ankle brace.

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: The PEB and the VA used different codes for the back condition; both were appropriate and rated under the same VASRD formula. The conflicting ratings were a result of different range-of-motion findings by the military and the VA. Although there were conflicting entries in the MEB report regarding the gait, which could have resulted in a 20% VASRD rating, the PEB rating was consistent with the data present at the time of separation. The PEB and the VA used different rating codes for the ankle, and the VA coding was more specific to the condition. IAW VASRD §4.3 and §4.7, the code more closely approximating rating criteria and yielding the higher evaluation should be assigned. By a vote of 2:1, the PDBR concluded that a 20% rating under code 5271, as per the VA, was indicated for the ankle. The single voter for dissent (who recommended increasing the rating for the back under 5241 to 20%) elected not to submit a minority opinion.

______________________________________________________________


RECOMMENDATION:

The PDBR therefore recommends that the CI’s prior determination be adjusted as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

Unfitting Condition VASRD Code Rating
Spinal fusion 5241 10%
Fracture R ankle 5271 20%
Combined 30%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dtd 20090113, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veteran's Affairs Treatment Record.

MICHAEL F. LoGRANDE

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00481

    Original file (PD2009-00481.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    All evidence considered, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20% for the chronic, painful left foot and ankle condition. Other PEB Conditions . Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00419

    Original file (PD2009-00419.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI had symptoms of myelopathy in all four extremities. At this time the CI had symptoms of right upper extremity radiculopathy. The diagnoses in his finding of unfitness were cervical spondylotic myelopathy status post spinal fusion C3-6, rather than cervical spondylosis status post spinal fusion, VASRD code 5241, rated at 20%; right (dominant) upper extremity motor and sensory radiculopathy associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy status post spinal fusion C3-6, VASRD code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00715

    Original file (PD2010-00715.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI had a low back condition rated by the VA at 10% after a previous separation from the service in 1992. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00226

    Original file (PD2012-00226.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the lumbar fusion L2-L3 condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Lumbar Fusion L2-L3 Condition . In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individuals’ records not be corrected to reflect a change in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01089

    Original file (PD2011-01089.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the DES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The PEB and VA both rated the back condition under code, 5241, spinal fusion, but with different disability ratings. At the C&P evaluation 4 months later, the CI reported his pain controlled on this reduced dose of medication with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00687

    Original file (PD2011-00687.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW S/P Fusion L4-5 and L5-S1 for HNP Condition . After due deliberation, in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the L2 vertebral fracture healed condition; and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00030

    Original file (PD-2014-00030.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The back and wrist conditions, characterized as “chronic low back pains status post (s/p) lumbar fusion and instrumentation with strut graft” and “chronic right wrist pain s/p open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the right distal radius fracture,” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEBadjudicated “chronic back pain, s/p lumbar fusion, w/o neurologic abnormality”and “chronic right wrist pain, s/p operative fixation of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00167

    Original file (PD2009-00167.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the PEB and determined unfit for the back condition (rated 10%) and right shoulder condition (rated 0%). The Board therefore recommends a 10% rating for the right shoulder condition. In the matter of the lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20% coded 5241 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00719

    Original file (PD-2014-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic pain, due to lumbar fusion x2 and sacroilitis with muscle spasm and antalgic gait” as unfitting, rated 20% with likely application of the of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00072

    Original file (PD2009-00072.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    These disabling conditions, along with the necessary medications for the pain and depression associated with these conditions, is why this rating should be reviewed by the PDBR. The initial VA rating and exam did not have the history of opioid dependence or treatment and separately rated the CI at 30%. Fusion of the lower back resulting in lower back pain and limitation of range of motion AND FUNCTION524140%Major depressive...