Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00785
Original file (FD-2014-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRST MlODLE INl'flAL)
(b) (6)
GRA OE
.
1Y1'£ GE I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE x     I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NA I E Of COUNSEL ANO OR ORGMllU\TION ADDRESS ANO OR ORG \J'/17.TION OFCOUNSEL
v :s No
x

MEMBER SlTTING
VOTE OF THE BOARD
llON GEN UOTllC' OTllER DENY
(b) (6) x
x
x
x
x
1ssv ;s       A94.53 INl)t;X NUIBER    A67.10 £X tll81TS SlJBMITTEO TO THE BOARO
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REV IEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEA RANCI:
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE IIEARING
ll EAR l G l)ATI;

07 Apr 2015

CASf. NUM8f.R

FD-2014-00785
Al'PLICANTS ISSUE AND TllE BOARD'S DECISIO!'IAI. RATIONAl.F ARE DISCUSSED ON TllE ATTACllED AIR FORCE DISCllARGE REVIEW BOARD DFCISIONAI. IV\TlONALE
Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a persona l appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.














        
TO:
SAJ'/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE -10 RANDOLPll AFB,TX 78150-4742
FROM:
SECRf:TAIH Of i11£Allt FOi\('£ 1SONNEL COUNCIL
1\IR FORCE OISOIARC£ REVltW 80M\O
153 COMMANO DR. Et: WINC. JRO l"LOOR
ANDREWS Al'B, MO 2'762-700 1
AFHQ FORM 0-2077 , JAN 00    (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE
CASE NU;\lBER


FD-2014-00785

GENERAL : The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available perti nent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The appl icant recei ved a General d ischarge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplina ry Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsi bil i ty to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regulari ty in the conduct of governmenta l affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand and four Records of Counsel ing. His misconduct included failure to go to place of duty (2x), dereliction of duties (2x), failure to go to mandatory squadron PT, consuming alcohol under the age of 21, wrongfull y proffering a fraudulent military identification card, and failure to obey lawful order by remai ning in residence while on quarters.

The appl icant submitted no issues regard ing the ineq ui ty or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that an upgrade would allow him to obtain better job opportuni ties. The Board opined that through the administrat ive actions taken, the applicant had ample opportuni t ies to change his negati ve behavior.
They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any posi t ive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. A discharge is upgraded only i f the appl icant and the Board can
establish that an inequ ity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization, reason for the
discharge or the reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substanti ve requi rements of the discharge regulation, was withi n the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing find ings. the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determi nes the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attach ment: Exami ner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00546

    Original file (FD-2014-00546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservice record.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00719

    Original file (FD-2013-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof discharge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined and requeststhatthe review becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors leadingtothe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeviaSpecialCourtMartial.The AirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyand equi...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019

    Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable;achangetothenarrativereasonandachangetothereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors lead ingto the discharge. FINDJNG: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof the discharge;reasonandauthorityfor discharge andchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00018

    Original file (FD-2015-00018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoIlonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thed ischarge.ISSU E:The applicantreceiveda General dischargeforMisconduct Minor Disciplinary Infractions The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00115

    Original file (FD-2015-00115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefconta insavailable pertinentdata ontheapplicant andthefactorsleading to the discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432

    Original file (FD-2014-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...