Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00115
Original file (FD-2015-00115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMB ER (LAST, FIRST Ml ODLE INlTIAL)    GRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANC E    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COVNS£l.  NAME OF COUNSEL A.'ID OR ORGA,'llL\TION   ADDRESS A.'ID OR ORCANIL\TION OFCOUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING   HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x x x

ISSUES
A94.55
IN1)£X NUM-8£
A67.90
EXHIBITS SUBMITTEDTO 1llEBOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL"S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADD!TIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARJNG DATE     CASE NUMBER

13 Jul 2015      FD-2015-00115
APPLICANT"S ISSUE ANDTIIEBOARD"S DECISKlNALRATIONALE ARll DISCUSSED ON nu;ATTACHED AIR FORC6DISCllARGSREVIEW OOMD DECISIONAL. RATIONALS.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








(b) (6)


·TO:      FROM:
SECRETARY OFTHE AI R FORCE PERSONN EL COUNCii..
AIR f'ORCE DISCHARGE ReVJEW SOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SU ITE 40     1535 coo OR. tE WING.3RO PLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781504742     ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM:0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2015-00115

GE ERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief conta ins available pertinent data on the appl icant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDI N G: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The appl icant recei ved a General discharge for M iscond uct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsi bility to examine the propriety and equity of an appl ican t's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presu mes regularity in the conduct of govern mental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumpt ion, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pe1tinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Article 15 for having a female in his dorm during restricted hours and making false statement about his location. He also recei ved four Letters of Repri mand for fai l ing to properly adhere to technical order procedures (2x), failing to report two members who he knew were drink ing while underage and reckless driving: ignoring a vi ual and/or audible signal to stop and one Letter of Counseli ng for fa i lure to repo1t on time.

The applican t cited his desire to recei ve the G.I. Bill benefi ts asjusti fication for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on February 13, 2009) that he u nderstood he must recei ve an Honorable discharge to recei ve future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the im pact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter of inequi ty or impropriety which would warran t an upgrade.

A d ischarge is u pgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establ ish that an inequ i ty or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to just ify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CO CLUSI ON: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the proced ura l and ubstanti ve requ irements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the appl icant was provided full administrat ive due process.

In view of the foregoing find ings, the Board fu1ther conclude that there exists no legal or equi table basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remai n unchanged.


Attachment: Exami ner's Brief



.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00015

    Original file (FD-2015-00015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorableandtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00785

    Original file (FD-2014-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservice record.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGenerald ischargefor Misconduct-MinorDisciplina ryInfractionsThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00118

    Original file (FD-2015-00118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsfor upgradeof discharge toHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)but declinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record. Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdata ontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00095

    Original file (FD-2013-00095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedb1ief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof thedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00477

    Original file (FD-2014-00477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. inviewoftheforegoing find ings:theBoardconcludesthatapplicanf sreenlistmentcodeis moreaccuratelyreflectedas 3Kandshouldbe changedunderthe provisionsof TitleI 0,USC1553.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00456

    Original file (FD 2014 00456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withcounsel,viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMaryland andTravisAFB, CAonSeptember25,2014. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinent data onthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00456

    Original file (FD-2014-00456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withcounsel,viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMaryland andTravisAFB, CAonSeptember25,2014. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinent data onthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00391

    Original file (FD 2014 00391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel, viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandTravisAFB,CAonSeptember22.2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothe discharge.