Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019
Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD H EARING RECORD
NA:\IF. Of Sf.f V I CF. M L\ llH:n (LAST, FIRST l'\ll DDLE IN ITIA i.)      GRA DE   AFSNISSAN
(b) (6(b) (6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEAR.A CE    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
C:OUNSt'.L       NAME OF COlf.'ISEL ANO OR ORG1\IU\TIO      ADDRESS AND OR ORGANltATION OF C'OlfNSEL
Yt:S     No
x
VOTE Of THE 60A RO
MEMBER SITTING   HON      GEN      UOl l!C  01llF.R  OFNY
(b) (6)  x


f-




f-




f-

-
ISSUES










A94.0S


















10,:0EX 1'l1l\IDER









A67.l0
x x x x
EXH IBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOAIU>
I ORDFR 1\PPOINTING TllE BOARD
/\PPI JC/\ I ION !'OR REVIEW OF DISCI IARGE
Lt I ll R O NOTIFICATION
13Rll:I' OJ Pl:RSONM:L I Lt
COUNSEL'S RELEASE·10 1111:: BOARD
ADDlllO'IAL EX111131"1 S SUBM rl ·1rnA TIME OF PCRSONAL APPEARANCl"

TAPE RECOllDING OF l'l·.RSONJ-\1. Al'l'EARANCf: I IEARING

llE \RING O\TE     CASI.NllMUt;R

07 Apr 20 15     FD-2015-000.19
APPLfCMl"S ISSllt A'-10 flI[ BOARD'S orCLSIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCLISSfD ON TllE' ATTACllI::oAfR FORCE OISCllARGB RflVIF\Y BOARD Dr:( ISIONAt. RATIONALE


Case heard in Washi ngton, D.C.

Advise applican t of the decision of t he Board, t he right to a persona l appea rance wi t h/without counsel, and the right to submi t an appl ica tion to the A FBCM R.








(b) (6)


IN DORSE IENT   DATE: .iJtS/20 I S
lO:      FRQ)J:
SAF MRBR         St:f Rt:lAR\ ot"fllt:All< FORCt: Pr.RSONNCI. \Ol \flL
,\IH f"ORC:-t: 1)18(llARCt:Rf:\ IE\\ BOARO
550 C s·1REE.I \VJSI. SUI I E --10         lJ.\ CO\l\IA U OR. ti-:\\ INC:.JHI) 1.-.. OOR
RANDOLPll AFB, TX 78 150---1742  ,\NORE\\ ,\f B.MO Z076l·700 1


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (E F-V2)         Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONA L RATIONA LE
CASE U\I BER

FD-2015-000 19

GENERAL: The appl icant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable; a change to the narrati ve reason and a change to the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a persona l appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but decl ined and requests that the review be completed based on the avai lable service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors lead ing to the discharge.

FINDJNG: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge; reason and authori ty for discharge and change of reenlistment code.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsibili ty to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. I n reviewing discharges, the Board presu mes regulari ty in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presum ption, to incl ude evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equi ty and propriety. The applica nt's record of service i ncl uded one Article 1 5, one Vacation of non-jud icial punishment, three Letters of Reprimand, and one Letter of Counseli ng. H is misconduct included sleeping on post, smoking in donn room, failure to follow standard procedures per special security instruction, failu re to obey regulation. failure to be on t ime for duty, and com municati ng indecent language and threats towards a fellow airman.

The appl icant contends that his discharge was inequitable because i t was too harsh. The ORB opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample oppo1tunities to change his negati ve behavior. The Board concluded the appl icant's miscond uct was a significant depa1ture from conduct
expected of all military mem bers. The Board also concluded that the negat ive aspects of the applican t's service outweighed the posi ti ve contributions he made i n his Air Force career. The characterization, narrati ve reason and re-en Iistment code of the discharge rccei vcd by the applican t were found to be appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only i f the applicant and the Board can establish that an ineq u i ty or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justi fy an upgrade of the discharge characterization, reason for the discharge or the reenl istment code.

CONCLUSION:      The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discha rge was consistent wi th the procedu ral and substanti ve requ irements of the discharge regulation, was wi t hin the discretion or the
discharge authority, and t hat the applicant was provided fu ll administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board fmther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determi nes the discharge should remain unchanged.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00754

    Original file (FD-2014-00754.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor MisconductThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00426

    Original file (FD-2014-00426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepe1tinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleading tothe discharge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilityto...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00581

    Original file (FD-2014-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof discharge toIlonorablc.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe avai Iableservice record.Theattachedbriercontai nsavailable pertinentdata onthe applicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforM iscondu<.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00118

    Original file (FD-2015-00118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsfor upgradeof discharge toHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)but declinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record. Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdata ontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432

    Original file (FD-2014-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.