Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00546
Original file (FD-2014-00546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NA or Sf.RV ICE ME:M(lER (LAST, FIRST MlODLEINITIAL)    GRAtH:   AFSN/SSAN
(b) (6(b) (6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NM I E Ot" COUNSEi. AND OR ORGANIZATION  ADDRESS AND ORORGAN17.ATl01'i Ot" ('OUNSEL
YES      So
x
VOTE OF THE 60ARO
M EMBER SITTING  llON     GEN      UOTll('  OTHER    DF.NY
(b) (6)  x
x x
x x

ISSUES
A94.05
JNDF.\'. Nl'i\ l llCtt
A67.10
EXlllBITS SUBMlrn:o TO TUE BOAR()
l OKDElt Al'POJNTING TllE BOAR D
2 A PPLIC'A rlON FOR RE\'IEW UF l)ISUIARGE
LI:I Il:R OF NO 1IFIC"A'l IUN
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSE L'S RELEASE TO IIIE UOAI{()
A L>DIrlONAL l:XI11131TS SUl3MITIED AT r!Ml: OF
rrnSONAL A l'PE/\R/\NCE
TAl'E Rt COl\DING OF PERSONAL Al'l'EARANC"E IIEARING


lltA INC IUTE    (",\$ 1; i<l'\ llll:R

24 Feb 20 15     FD-2014-00546
APPl,.ICANT·s rssvr; ANO 'fl'41! 00.\A.l)·s DOClSIONAL RATIONALE. AR6 DlSC\JSSf:D o TllB ATTA('Ht:D AIR FORCC: DISC"I IARGCl'tGVIGW DOARO Ol!CIStONAL l\ATl01'At6.


Case heard in Wash ington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/withou t counsel, and the ri ght to submit an appl ication to the A FBCM R.









(b) (6)


INUUH l':Ml':NT         DATE: 3/ 18/2015
TO.      FROM:
S/\F/J\IRBR        s1;uu;MR\ OFTllE \IR rORl'E r1:K SOl'l'EL COllNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCllARGE RE\'1[\\' BOARD
550 C' STHEET WESl', SUITE -10   1 .l ('0\li\IANO DR. fF. \\'h"\C. lRO f l OOR
RANDOLPH :\FB. TX 78 1 50--17-12  ANDREll'S MB.MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous






AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONA LE
CASE NUIBER

FD-2014-00546

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant recei ved a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Appl icant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterizat ion of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmenta l affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant 's record of service included one Article 15 for wrongly degrading the body of a deceased reti red service member; four Letters of Reprimand for making false official statements, lying about owning a motorcycle and not adhering to the base motorcycle requirements, fai lure to pass a fitness assessment (2x); and one Letter of Counseli ng for failure to return from lunch on time.

The applicant contends discharge was inequitable because i t was too harsh. The appl ican t states that his discharge was due i n part to injuries from a motorcycle accident; two fitness assessment fai lures and an Article 1 5 recei ved for actions that he did not commi t. After a review of the records, the DRB determined that the acts of misconduct were not related to the injuries sustained from the motorcycle accident. The Board also detenni ned that a lthough accepting an Article 15 is not an admission of guil t, the mem ber had the opportu ni ty to decline the Article 15 and have his case heard via court martial. The applicant had ample opportuni ties to change his negati ve behavior through the administrati ve actions taken against him. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of a l l
mili tary members. The Board further concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant 's service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his A i r Force career. The characterizat ion of the discharge recei ved by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedura l and substant ive req uirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing find ings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and detennines the discharge should remai n unchanged.

A ttach ment:
Exami ner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00115

    Original file (FD-2015-00115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefconta insavailable pertinentdata ontheapplicant andthefactorsleading to the discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00594

    Original file (FD-2014-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge A discharge isupgradedonly ifthe applicantandtheBoardcanestablishthatan inequityorimproprietytookplaceatthe time of discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00477

    Original file (FD-2014-00477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. inviewoftheforegoing find ings:theBoardconcludesthatapplicanf sreenlistmentcodeis moreaccuratelyreflectedas 3Kandshouldbe changedunderthe provisionsof TitleI 0,USC1553.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00155

    Original file (FD-2014-00155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorableandchangeofauthorityfordischarge,andchange ofreenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00666

    Original file (FD-2014-00666.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: Theapplicant appeals foranupgradeofthedischarge to Honorable;a changetothereasonand authorityforthedischargeandtochangethere-enlistmentcode.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard DRB,withcounsel,atAndrewsAFBonMarch 10, 2015. The followingwitnessalsotestifiedontheapplicant'sbehalf:(wife)(b) (6)Thefollowingadditionalexhibits weresubmittedatthe hearing:Exhibit #4: Applicant'sContentionsExhibit#5:CharacterreferencelettersThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00031

    Original file (FD-2015-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00310

    Original file (FD-2014-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof dischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservice record. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00105

    Original file (FD-2014-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischarge, changetothenarrative reason, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.