Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00546
Original file (FD-2008-00546.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVI

 
 
   

TYPE GEN

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

CE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

   

AFSN/SSAN

   

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

xX RECORD REVIEW

 

 

   

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TO:
SAF/M.

 

 

NDORSEMENT |e.

RBR

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

MEMBER OTITER DENY
x
x
Xx
x
x
ISSUES 493.93 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 2 ES SUBMI BOARD. os
A94.05 1] |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
‘TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER /
FD-2008-00546

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD)-2008-00546

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and his incidents of
misconduct were as a result of his anxiety and nervous condition. The records indicated the applicant
received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, and two Records of Individual Counseling for
misconduct. His misconduct included failure to complete a primary duty, failure to report for duty on time
(3x), failure to complete tasking as directed by his supervisor, being drunk and disorderly, failure to obey an
order and recklessly damaging a light post. The applicant contends he is being treated by mental health at
the Veterans Administration. The DRB opined that although the applicant has been seeing mental health, it
did not impair his ability to know right from wrong or ability to choose the right. The DRB opined that
through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior.
The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive
contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the
applicant was found to be appropriate.

Issue 2, Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports,
letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. ‘hey found the seriousness of the willful misconduct
offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00301

    Original file (FD2008-00301.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL oes MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY xX x | | Xx Xx x ISSUES A93.11 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2006-00403

    Original file (FD2006-00403.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    X=Change Reason and Authority and Reenlistment Code a “TO: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00403 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00142

    Original file (FD-2009-00142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE ATTACHED AIR LORCE DISCHARGE REV EW SOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00353

    Original file (FD-2008-00353.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN - Xx RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL a UOTHC HON x X xX ae —— x x ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER ACID — £ KHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THER 2 J] J/ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00204

    Original file (FD-2009-00204.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FUKRUE DISCHAKGE KEVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AIC AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION + ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING ; x | i Xx | ' xX x { x | sooves 93.33 INDEX NUMBER A67 1 0 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 \APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00181

    Original file (FD2008-00181.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN atc |__| x RECORD REVIEW ;] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION a ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING OTHER DENY | x Xx x x Xx ISSUES 45 99 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 HEB A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 13 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00389

    Original file (FD-2010-00389.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093

    Original file (FD-2009-00093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203

    Original file (FD2008-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00052

    Original file (FD-2009-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL PERE es ce ee Oe HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x xX INDEX NUMBER ISSUES 494.05 A67.10 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00052 application to the AFBCMR. AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) i SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535...