Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00052
Original file (FD-2009-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

  

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

     

 

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

x RECORD REVIEW

 

 

   

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

 

 

 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 
  

PERE
es ce

ee
Oe

HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

 

 

 

x

 

xX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDEX NUMBER

ISSUES 494.05 A67.10

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

 

FD-2009-00052

application to the AFBCMR.

TO:
SAT/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

8" TXEUBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOAR
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARID

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT ‘TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

See l=

 

 

 

 

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

 

 

i

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MI) 20762-7001

 

 

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

FD-2009-00052

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUES:

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He admits that he made a few errors
and has learned from his mistakes. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Letter of
Reprimand and three Memorandums for Record for misconduct. His misconduct consisted of failure to pay
debts, being delinquent on his Government Travel Card (4x), and viewing, downloading and storing
pornographic material on his government computer. The DRB opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that
the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air
Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203

    Original file (FD2008-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00078

    Original file (FD-2009-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code EUR SOT a f s NE TO: FROM: ; SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL Ban EES AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD §50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00078 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00204

    Original file (FD-2009-00204.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FUKRUE DISCHAKGE KEVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AIC AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION + ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING ; x | i Xx | ' xX x { x | sooves 93.33 INDEX NUMBER A67 1 0 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 \APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00189

    Original file (FD-2009-00189.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3 _|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ee COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 27 May 2010 FD-2009-00189 ST EON ONALE ARE DISCUSSED.ON THE ATTACHED AIR FOR DISCHARGE ae . The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00156

    Original file (FD-2009-00156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND GR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE:BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x SS ws 7 jl — ms mm Tr a 5 ms ae Tn ISSUES A93.19 INDEX NUMBER AG67.10 EXHIBITS SU MIL EES A93.23 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THEBOARD A94.05 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00184

    Original file (FD-2009-00184.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed bascd on the available service record. FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093

    Original file (FD-2009-00093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00756

    Original file (FD-2009-00756.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x = x x x ISSUES A94, 1 1 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE | |TAPE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00217

    Original file (FD2008-00217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN AMN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW : | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x Xx x x ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 - ATUBTES SUB : 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00042

    Original file (FD-2009-00042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE.BOARL’S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00042 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. ...