Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00191
Original file (FD2008-00191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

     
 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE copy PERSONAL APPEARANCE Xx RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
Xx
Xx
Xx
Xx
x
ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 | EXHIBITS SUBMITT!

1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

 

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE ,

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

07 Jul 2009 FD-2008-00191

APPLICANT'S. ISSUE AND THE BOARD’S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED-ON: THE ATTACHED: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW: BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

 

 

    

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

X = Upgrade, Reason for Discharge and Reenlistment Code

  

 

INDORSEMENT — ae DATE: 7/14/21
To: } FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00191

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment
code.

NPA The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but
declined to exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Applicant requests a change of her re-entry code contending that after reviewing her file, she found nothing
in reference to sexual misconduct and having a code of this nature in her records is personally damaging and
unjust. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force for a pattern of misconduct prejudicial to good
order and discipline with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. She received an Article 15, a
vacation of nonjudicial punishment and four Letters of Reprimand. None of the misconduct involved sexual
misconduct, nor was the applicant’s re-entry code related to sexual misconduct. It appears that the applicant
mistakenly believed that her discharge was based upon “sexual misconduct.”

The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive
contributions she made in her Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the
applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00191

    Original file (FD-2009-00191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board noted the issue was common result of miscommunication, at the time of discharge, when the applicant is briefed that their discharge will automatically be upgraded after six months.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00474

    Original file (FD-2008-00474.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a rere er ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXEUBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD [2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 18 Mar 2010 FD-2008-00474 IOARD 5 DECISIONAL RATIONALB'ARE DISCUSSED ON GE i ” ae Case heard in Washington, D.C. The applicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2006-00403

    Original file (FD2006-00403.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    X=Change Reason and Authority and Reenlistment Code a “TO: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00403 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00024

    Original file (FD2008-00024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found the commander’s decision to initiate administrative action is supported by the evidence in the record and concludes the discharge was appropriate. The Board found no evidence available in the record and none was presented by the applicant to warrant a change of the discharge. The Board found no evidence to substantiate to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00171

    Original file (FD2008-00171.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    X + UPGRADE, REASON FOR DISCHARGE, AND REENLISTMENT CODE TO: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL SAF/MRBR AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00171 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00065

    Original file (FD-2009-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code hears REE TO: a : #8 ee ae ie a SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 INDORSE ME Doe persmany FROM: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR, REVIEW OF DISCHARGE de | OE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00512

    Original file (FD-2008-00512.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    |2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 \LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEIL.’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAI EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 20 May 2010 FD-2008-00512 oat PRICANT: 8 SUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALY ql THB ATTACHED AIR FORCE: Tew. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00278

    Original file (FD2008-00278.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 X — Upgrade, Reason for Discharge, Reenlistment Code Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change reason for discharge and change of the reenlistment code are denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record...