Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00171
Original file (FD2008-00171.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

  
     
 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN

Se A a
PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ | “appress AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN votuc | OTHER DENY
|
x
x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSUES

 

A95.00 INDEXNUMBER —A67.10

 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

mG fam

 

 

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

 

 

29 Jun 2009 FD-2008-00171
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S: DECIS! ONAL RATIONALE

   
    

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the night to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

X + UPGRADE, REASON FOR DISCHARGE, AND REENLISTMENT CODE

 

 

TO:

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00171

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for discharge and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge and to change the
reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE:

The applicant submitted that she was told that the disciplinary action she received while she was in technical
school would be pulled from her personnel files. She noted that she received an Article 15 for underage
drinking while she was in technical school. The Board noted that the case file did not contain an Article 15
for underage drinking. The applicant was discharged for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions, with a
general discharge under honorable conditions. Her misconduct consisted of two Article 15s and two
Records of Individual Counseling for using a government credit card for unofficial purposes, violating a no-
contact order, failing to safeguard government property (military identification card) and failing to prepare
for deployment. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in
this case on which to base an upgrade of the discharge. The Board opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her behavior. They found the seriousness of the
willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance during her two and half
years in the Air Force. The Board concluded the characterization and the reenlistment code appropriate for
the reasons which were the basis for this case.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00044

    Original file (FD-2009-00044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY 580 C STREET WEST, SULLE 4u 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00044 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade to honorable, change reason and authority and authority and change reenlistment code. he Board finds that neither the evidence of record...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00171

    Original file (FD2004-00171.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I I MEMBER SITTING 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 ( BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDlTIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ( TAPE RECORDMG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I HEARING DATE 21 Oct 2004 CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00171 1 Case heard via video teleconference between...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00376

    Original file (FD-2010-00376.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00658

    Original file (FD-2014-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge to Honorable. Theapplicant wasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factors leadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00404

    Original file (FD2007-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN = TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Bea oe MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER | DENY — xX x x x x 7 =e ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee : E t 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00180

    Original file (FD2003-00180.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends her discharge was improper because of errors in disciplinary documentation, her supervisor illegally obtained her hotel receipts, and incorrect counseling regarding re-classification into alternate career fields. Legal counsel also found no evidence the applicant's supervisor acted illegally in obtaining a hotel receipt. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF Atch 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00299

    Original file (FD2008-00299.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW .| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x xX xX 7 — issuES 94,53 INDEXNOMBER 464.00 2 BOIS SUBMEETED A93.01 [1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD |2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00616_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00616_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00297

    Original file (FD2008-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AB TYPE | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW G :| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x xX xX X ISSUES A94.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ae | HAE £S N a A93.33 (1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00165

    Original file (FD-2009-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME. ¥t X¥+ X*+ XFt ISSUES A01.00 INDEX NUMBER AGT.10 OO : EXHIBIFS: SUBMITTED TO THLE BOARD oo A92.41 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A95.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE oe 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 7 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RI ASK TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...