Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00474
Original file (FD-2008-00474.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
Pl AMN Po
TYPE GEN X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
AMERICAN LEGION ATTN: QUEEN BAKER 1608 K STREET NW
WASHINGTON DC 20006
ae eee
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UVOTHC OTHER DENY
x
x
x
x
Xx.
a rere er
ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXEUBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
[2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
18 Mar 2010 FD-2008-00474

 

 

IOARD 5 DECISIONAL RATIONALB'ARE DISCUSSED ON GE
i ” ae

Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

X — Upgrade, Reason for Discharge, and Reenlistment Code

 

ATE! 4/27/2010

 

 

 

 

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
aman a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, IRD FLOOR
RANDOLFH AFB, ‘TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MDD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (FF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00474

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and change
the reenlistment code. The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and factors
leading to the discharge.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) with counsel at Andrews
AI'B on 18 Mar 2010. The following witness also testified on the applicant’s behalf: Ms. Andrea C. Hines
(Sister).

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:
Exhibit 6: American Legion Statement

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and change of reenlistment code are denied.
The board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable because she was treated unfairly and too harsh by
her command and supervisor while assigned to the 321S. She also contends there was an abuse of power by
her command and she received no support from leadership in regards 1o domestic abuse and sexual assault
by her spouse. The records indicated the applicant received a special court martial for being derelict in the
performance of her duties on two occasions, failing to present an AF Form 988 (Leave Request/
Authorization) signed by her supervisor, attempting to access the controlled campus area with a temporary
security access badge assigned to another Air Force member, wrongfully and falsely altering the actual
number of days she was to be on quarters, and without authority fail to go at the time prescribed to her
appointed place of duty. She was discharged with a general discharge under honorable conditions after
serving 3 years and 5 months of her 6 year enlistment. The Discharge Review Board opined that through
these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The
Board found applicant’s contention to be without merit and concluded the misconduct was a significant
departure from conduct expected of all military members and the characterization of the discharge received
by the applicant found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00228

    Original file (FD-2010-00228.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews AFB on 08 Mar 2012. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00037

    Original file (FD-2009-00037.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW "COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION Fe ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL a ~~ | ee meses ose os foe qotEor TR ae | MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY / xX*+ X*t+ et X*+ x*t ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.05 A67.10 Jes A9?2,21 1 Revere A93.11 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE a A93.07 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00475

    Original file (FD-2008-00475.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    va apna mer ootier AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH APB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00475 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. When she was able to make her doctor’s...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00065

    Original file (FD-2009-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code hears REE TO: a : #8 ee ae ie a SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 INDORSE ME Doe persmany FROM: ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR, REVIEW OF DISCHARGE de | OE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00497

    Original file (FD-2008-00497.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AMERICAN LEGION 1608 K STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ME x¥4 XFt xe X¥t issues — : — VW BO ISSUES A93.15 INDEX NUMBER AG7.90 Pe ee ae A94.05 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD }2_| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ne. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00471

    Original file (FD2008-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL The American Legion . ~ see ee ees MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ L — _ | —__| [ xt X*t+ X*+ ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION (a BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00330

    Original file (FD-2008-00330.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A93.01 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIGF OF PERSONNEL FII.E __ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER , 10 Aug 2010 FD-2008-00330 s at HEANT S ISSUE ANI THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL Ky Case heard in Washington, D.C via video-teleconference from Randolph AFB, Texas. nen: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00278

    Original file (FD-2010-00278.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN xX PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW ees ed NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL QUEEN BAKER American Legion 1608 K Street Nw Washington DC | X 20006 MEMBER SITTING | ISSUES A01.43 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 A92.01 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A02.12 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00262

    Original file (FD-2010-00262.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    i | Poof GEE J x i ee ee poo oG oF bE dG | i oy | | i of 4 | i ; ; i i ee ee | i 4 “ ee | HE | Poy od | rf - Po bod ot dg | ISSUES ‘493.19 INDEX NUMBER rn 67.10 oe a a is f A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.01 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Mar 2012...