Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00278
Original file (FD2008-00278.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

AB

 

TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

xX RECORD REVIEW

 

   

"| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHC | OTHER DENY
x
xX
|
xX
X
xX
ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.10
1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
29 Jun 2009 FD-2008-00278

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

application to the AFBCMR.

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

X — Upgrade, Reason for Discharge, Reenlistment Code

 

 

 

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

THE A BAAD DO¥SCNENT

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

 

Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00278

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason for
discharge and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change reason for discharge and change of the reenlistment code are
denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Applicant submitted no specific issues contending the inequity or impropriety of her discharge, but requests
that her discharge be upgraded because she is considering rejoining the military. The record indicates that
the applicant received two Article 15s for being absent without leave, with intent to deceive make a false
official statement, willfully/wrongfully damage property belonging to a fellow airman, and stealing a Bank
of America debit card belonging to Amn and misappropriated food, gas, and other items with same said

card. After thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant an upgrade of
the discharge, reason for discharge or the reenlistment code. ;

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00228

    Original file (FD2008-00228.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN 4 | TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON "GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY X*+ X*+ xX X*+ ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 2 A94,05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00270

    Original file (FD2008-00270.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE > RECORD REVIEW og ;| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY xX x x x Xx ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A67.30 baci a et ete ed A92.01 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 ) APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00386

    Original file (FD-2010-00386.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No xX MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER DENY -— x x x Xx ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A67.00 A94.55 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00383

    Original file (FD-2008-00383.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00596

    Original file (FD-2008-00596.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00278

    Original file (FD-2010-00278.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN xX PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW ees ed NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL QUEEN BAKER American Legion 1608 K Street Nw Washington DC | X 20006 MEMBER SITTING | ISSUES A01.43 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 A92.01 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A02.12 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00037

    Original file (FD-2009-00037.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW "COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION Fe ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL a ~~ | ee meses ose os foe qotEor TR ae | MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY / xX*+ X*t+ et X*+ x*t ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.05 A67.10 Jes A9?2,21 1 Revere A93.11 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE a A93.07 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00191

    Original file (FD-2009-00191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board noted the issue was common result of miscommunication, at the time of discharge, when the applicant is briefed that their discharge will automatically be upgraded after six months.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00231

    Original file (FD2008-00231.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    X = Upgrade, Reason for Discharge and Reenlistment Code a SIGNAPO RE OF RECORDER SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 — ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00231 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge...