Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01269
Original file (BC-2005-01269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                        DOCKET  NUMBER:   BC-2005-
01269
                                             INDEX CODE:  137.03

                                             COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO



MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  11 OCTOBER 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to terminate  his  spouse  only  coverage  under  the
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) retroactive to the date  of  his  Civil
Service (CS) retirement (24 May 1973).

___________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 27 Oct 05, the  Board  considered  and  denied  the  applicant’s
request to correct his records to allow him to terminate his spouse
only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) retroactive  to
the date of his Civil Service (CS) retirement (24 May  1973).   The
Board further noted if the applicant’s current  spouse  provided  a
notarized statement concurring in the permanent revocation  of  her
SBP  coverage  currently  in  effect,  they  would  be  willing  to
reconsider the applicant’s request.  For an accounting of the facts
and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of
the earlier decision by the Board, see the  Record  of  Proceedings
(ROP) at Exhibit E.

Applicant provided a notarized statement from  his  current  spouse
relinquishing her entitlement to the SBP annuity (Exhibit F).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After careful consideration of the applicant’s  recent  submission,
specifically a notarized statement from his wife concurring in  the
permanent revocation of her Survivor Benefit  Plan  (SBP)  coverage
currently in effect, we agree with the Air Force office of  primary
responsibility and conclude that applicant should  receive  partial
relief.  Therefore, we recommend that the  applicant’s  records  be
corrected as indicated below.

___________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 June 1998, he
elected to disenroll from the Survivor Benefit  Plan  (SBP),  under
the provisions of Public Law 105-85.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01269 in Executive Session on 25 January 2006, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

All members voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommend.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Nov 05,
                W/exhibits A through D.
    Exhibit F.  Spouse’s Letter, dated 22 Nov 05.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

AFBCMR BC-2005-01269




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to [APPLICANT], be corrected to show that on 1 June
1998, he elected to disenroll from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP),
under the provisions of Public Law 105-85.





            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency


                   AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION
                        OF MILITARY RECORDS

               CASE TRANSMITTAL / COORDINATION RECORD


IN THE MATTER OF:                                  DOCKET NO:

ALBERT L. DENAPOLI, 104-01-6172   BC-2005-01269


ROUTE IN TURN    INITIALS  DATE


1.  CHIEF EXAMINER     ________  ________
    (Coordination)


2.  EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR       ________  ________
    (Coord/Signature)



3.  RETURN TO EXAMINER TO E-MAIL/FAX


    TO PANEL CHAIR


4.  Mr. Michael K. Gallogly  ________  ________
    PANEL CHAIR
    (Signature on Proceedings)

5.  SAF/MRB (Approval) ________  ________



6.  EXAMINER


7.  AFBCMR (Processing)




                                 BRENDA J. THOMAS
                                 Examiner
                                 Air Force Board for Correction
                                 of Military Records

                           AFBCMR CUSTOMER SURVEY


BOARD DECISION         GRANT DENY

TIMELINESS

1.  How long, from the time you first submitted your application, did you
wait for the final decision?

      a.  4 months     b.  8 months     c.  12 months    d.  more than 12
months

2.  How long, from the time you first submitted your application, did you
wait for an Advisory Opinion from the Air Force?

      a.  2 months     b.  4 months     c.  6 months     d.  more than 6
months

COURTESY

1.  If you made any telephone inquiries, were you treated in a courteous
and professional manner?

      a.  Yes          b.  No           c.  Could be improved  d.  N/A

2.  Were you provided a response on a timely basis?

      a.  Yes          b.  No           c.  Could be improved  d.  N/A

3.  If you made any written inquiries, were you provided a timely and
accurate response?

      a.  Yes          b.  No           c.  Could be improved  d.  N/A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

The Record of Proceedings (ROP) contains a summary of your request, your
contentions, the facts, Air Force evaluation, your rebuttal, if any, and
the conclusion and recommendation by the Board.  With this in mind,

1.  Were your requests and contentions accurately stated?

      a.  Yes          b.  No           c.  Could be improved  d.  N/A

2.  Did the Air Force advisory(ies) adequately and objectively address the
issue?

      a.  Yes          b.  No           c.  Could be improved  d.  N/A

3.  Were you provided adequate time to respond to Air Force advisory(ies)?

      a.  Yes          b.  No

4.  Was the rationale of the AFBCMR or the Air Force responsive to the
issues raised?

      a.  Yes          b.  No           c.  Could be better    d.  Missed
the point


COMMENTS

Please use the space below for any additional comments that would help us
to improve our processing of future cases.







                           AFBCMR CUSTOMER SURVEY


      We wish to improve upon our customer service and we need your help.
We are sending a copy of this letter and the attached survey to each
applicant upon completion of his or her case -- whether the case was
granted or denied -- in an effort to receive feedback concerning our short-
comings and our strong points.  Since we are not a part of the decision-
making process, this survey should not be used to debate the merits of the
decision of the AFBCMR in your case.  We merely want to know what changes,
if any, that we can implement administratively to provide a more timely
response and a better product within the constraints of our limited
manpower.

      Please take a few minutes and circle the answer which best describes
your views of our administrative handling of your case and mail your
response to:

                             EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
                                   AFBCMR
                             EE Wing, 3rd Floor
                         Andrews AFB, MD  20762-7002


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01269-2

    Original file (BC-2005-01269-2.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board further noted if the applicant’s current spouse provided a notarized statement concurring in the permanent revocation of her SBP coverage currently in effect, they would be willing to reconsider the applicant’s request. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Nov 05, W/exhibits A through D. Exhibit F. Spouse’s Letter, dated 22 Nov 05. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01269 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02963

    Original file (BC-2004-02963.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02963 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Corrective action be taken to reflect he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-00742

    Original file (BC-2003-00742.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ___________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 30 Mar 05, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to correct his records to show he filed a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board further noted if the applicant’s current spouse provided a notarized statement relinquishing her potential entitlement to the SBP annuity, they would be willing to reconsider the applicant’s request. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01269

    Original file (BC-2005-01269.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01269 INDEX CODE: 137.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to terminate his spouse only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) retroactive to the date of his Civil Service (CS) retirement (24 May 1973). PL 92-425,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02555-2

    Original file (BC-2004-02555-2.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The former member remarried three years after he retired from the Air Force. We are persuaded by the evidence presented that it was the applicant’s intent to provide his former spouse the SBP annuity and satisfied that his widow is fully aware she is relinquishing her entitlement to the annuity. Novel, Member All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01092

    Original file (BC-2006-01092.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01092 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED) HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 OCTOBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former husband’s records be corrected to show he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). No recommendation is provided...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03820

    Original file (BC-2005-03820.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 1999, the applicant submitted a request to terminate his SBP coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85. PL 108-375 authorized an open enrollment period from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 to enroll in SBP, but the law stipulates that servicemembers who terminated coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85 can not renter the program. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02487

    Original file (BC-2005-02487.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was informed the request for change had to be submitted in writing and his former spouse would be required to initiate the election form. In support of the application, the applicant submits a copy of a letter from DFAS, a copy of his letter to DFAS, a copy of his divorce decree, and the original SBP Election Statement of Former Spouse Coverage form. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-02487 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01562.dpc

    Original file (BC-2006-01562.dpc.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of the application, the applicant provided a copy of his Divorce Judgment and DD Form 2656-1, SBP elections statement for former spouse coverage. No recommendation is provided (Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02125

    Original file (BC-2005-02125.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The member elected spouse only coverage based on full retired pay during the Plan’s initial enrollment period authorized by Public Law (PL) 92-425. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states this situation started with his 11 Feb 05 request to DFAS to obtain cost and facts as to whether he could enroll his wife in the military SBP and CSRS SBP. ...