Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00348
Original file (BC-2012-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:   BC-2012-00348 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
    
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His reentry (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term, or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be 
changed to allow him to enlist in any branch of the Armed Forces. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He wishes to serve his country in the Naval Reserves and feels 
that  his  prior  service  as  a  security  forces  member  can  be 
beneficial. 
 
He does not provide any supporting documentation. 
 
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 15 Jul 08.  
The  applicant’s  narrative  reason  for  separation  reflects 
“completion of required active service” with an RE code of “2X”.  
He  received  an  honorable  discharge  after  serving  2  years, 
10 months, and 16 days on active duty. 
 
The  applicant’s  AF  IMT  418,  Selective  Reenlistment  Program 
Consideration, reflects that on 9 Feb 10 his supervisor and unit 
commander did not recommend him for reenlistment.  The applicant 
acknowledged  receipt  and  declined  to  appeal  the  reenlistment 
recommendation decision. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSOA  recommends  denial  stating  that  the  applicant’s 
discharge  was  under  the  Air  Force  FY11  Force  Shaping  Rollback 
Program  and  he  does  not  provide  any  evidence  of  an  error  or 
injustice that warrants changing his RE code. 
 
 
 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 27 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00348 in Executive Session on 9 Aug 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

 

2 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2012-00348 
was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 8 Mar 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Mar 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165

    Original file (BC-2012-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02457

    Original file (BC-2011-02457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. However, his duty performance is the reason he was denied reenlistment, requiring a RE code 2X and his discharge under the Early Separation Program - Strength Reduction was not the reason for the RE code 2X. We find no evidence of error in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503

    Original file (BC 2014 02503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of “2X” (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02296

    Original file (BC 2013 02296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in regards to his non-selection for reenlistment. Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414

    Original file (BC-2011-03414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657

    Original file (BC-2013-00657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes “Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR,” to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193

    Original file (BC-2012-00193.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03718

    Original file (BC 2014 03718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03718 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st Term, 2nd Term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed so he can reenter the military. On 14 Nov 11, the applicant’s commander did not select him for reenlistment under the Fiscal Year 2012 Date of Separation Rollback Program. The remaining...