Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04595
Original file (BC-2011-04595.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04595 

 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) under the Post-911 GI 
Bill be made retroactive to a date prior to his retirement date 
of 1 Oct 09. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He completed his retirement briefings in May and Jun 09 and 
started his terminal leave on 26 Jun 09. He was not notified of 
the option to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits before he 
retired. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 1 Oct 09, the applicant retired from the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of major (O-4). 

 

Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty 
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 
2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: 

 

• Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the 
date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in 
the Armed Forces from the date of election. 


 

• Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active 
duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of election, is 
precluded by either standard policy (service or DoD) or 
statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to 
serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy 
or statute, or 


 

 


• Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 
August 1, 2009, through August 1, 2013. A service member is 
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has 
completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of 
reserve service. 


 

• For those individuals eligible for retirement on 
August 1, 2009, no additional service is required. 




 

• For those individuals who have an approved retirement 
date after August 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, no 
additional service is required. 




 

• For those individuals eligible for retirement after 
August 1, 2009, and before August 1, 2010, 1 year of 
additional service after approval of transfer is 
required. 




 

• For those individuals eligible for retirement on or 
after August 1, 2010, and before August 1, 2011, 2 years 
of additional service after approval of transfer are 
required. 




 

• For those individuals eligible for retirement on or 
after August 1, 2011, and before August 1, 2012, 3 years 
of additional service after approval of transfer 
required. 




 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting that while the Air Force did 
not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out members who were 
already on terminal leave or who had already completed their pre-
separation counseling, in order to provide them with additional 
counseling on the Post-9/11 BI Bill, the applicant has not 
provided adequate justification/documentation showing he was 
wrongly denied proper counseling. Further, the applicant did 
receive pre-separation counseling for educational benefits prior 
to his terminal leave in Jun 09. 

 

DPSIT’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 22 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an error or injustice. While we note the steps 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were 
taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears 
that through no fault of the applicant, he was not timely made 
aware of his eligibility and the steps necessary to transfer his 
benefits to his dependents. As such, we find the evidence 
provided sufficient to resolve any doubt in this matter in the 
applicant’s favor and do not find it reasonable to conclude that 
he would have knowingly elected not to pursue use of this 
important entitlement. Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt 
in this matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the 
records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he elected to 
transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits on 
30 September 2009. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-04595 in Executive Session on 11 Sep 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated, 14 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 15 Dec 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01234

    Original file (BC-2010-01234.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01072

    Original file (BC-2010-01072.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02935

    Original file (BC-2009-02935.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an email stating he could request his retirement date be moved from 1 Aug 09 to 1 Sep 09 to take advantage of the new GI Bill and transfer benefits. The applicant’s last duty day was 31 Jul 09 with a 1 Aug 09 retirement date. Additionally, the application does not state applications would be received until 31 Jul 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574

    Original file (BC-2009-04574.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574

    Original file (BC-2009-04574.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291

    Original file (BC-2010-01291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEB’s requirement to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01351

    Original file (BC-2010-01351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after August 1, 2009 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880

    Original file (BC-2010-00880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180

    Original file (BC-2010-01180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00141

    Original file (BC-2012-00141.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, the letter he received from the DVA acknowledging his Post 9/11 application, dated 25 Jun 09, mentioned nothing about a transfer being required. Further, DPSIT notes the applicant did receive pre-separation counseling on 9 Oct 08 for educational benefits prior to his terminal leave in Jun 09. Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the 3 Panel Chair Member Member applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated below.