DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00141
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed the opportunity to transfer his Post-911 GI Bill
benefits.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to terminal leave, he left the Air Force effective 24 Jun 09
and began civilian employment on 6 Jul 09. He learned on 21 Dec
11 from another retiree that a transfer request for Post 9/11 GI
benefits had to be submitted prior to his retirement.
He called the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), and was told
the capability to apply prior to 1 Aug 09 didn’t even exist when
he retired. Neither did he receive any notification when the
capability became available to use for transfer of benefits.
Further, the letter he received from the DVA acknowledging his
Post 9/11 application, dated 25 Jun 09, mentioned nothing about a
transfer being required.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his
retirement orders, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or
Release from Active Duty, other retirement documents, and a copy
of the noted DVA letter.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant began his military service on 15 Aug 89. He served
for 20 years and 16 days before being honorably discharged on
31 Aug 09 and retired for length of service, effective 1 Sep 09.
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1,
2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:
Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the
date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in
the Armed Forces from the date of election.
Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active
duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of election, is
precluded by either standard policy (service or DoD) or
statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to
serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy
or statute, or
Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from
August 1, 2009, through August 1, 2013. A service member is
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has
completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of
reserve service.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on
August 1, 2009, no additional service is required.
For those individuals who have an approved retirement
date after August 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, no
additional service is required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement after
August 1, 2009, and before August 1, 2010, 1 year of
additional service after approval of transfer is
required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or
after August 1, 2010, and before August 1, 2011, 2 years
of additional service after approval of transfer are
required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or
after August 1, 2011, and before August 1, 2012, 3 years
of additional service after approval of transfer
required.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting that while the Air Force did
not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out members who were
already on terminal leave or who had already completed their pre-
separation counseling in order to provide them with additional
counseling on the Post-9/11 GI Bill, the applicant has not
2
had
been
programs
provided adequate justification/documentation showing he was
wrongly denied proper counseling.
Further, DPSIT notes the applicant did receive pre-separation
counseling on 9 Oct 08 for educational benefits prior to his
terminal leave in Jun 09.
DPSIT’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Air Force advisory opinion’s basis for recommending the
applicant’s request be denied are that the applicant received pre-
separation counseling and the DVA had provided a link on their
website that, had the applicant followed, he would have been led
to the Official DoD TEB website. The applicant argues that his
pre-separation counseling was conducted 9 Oct 08, well before the
transfer-to-dependent
established.
Additionally, the link on DVA website that was supposed to have
guided him to another site actually did not contain the link
during the time he was separating. Further, the Air Force’s
claims the transferability feature was widely publicized and the
website DoD developed a to facilitate the transfer of educational
benefits was operation on 27 Jun 09, does not take into
consideration the fact that after 2 Jun 09, he simply did not have
access to any internal military communications as he was on
terminal leave. Nor was he notified by DoD, DVA, or the Air Force
of any time constraints associated with the transfer of benefits.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While we note
the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was
not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps necessary
to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In addition we find
no basis to question the applicant's account in this matter and
do not find it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected
not to pursue use of this important entitlement. Therefore, we
elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the
3
Panel Chair
Member
Member
applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated
below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he elected to
transfer his Post-9/11 educational benefits to his dependent.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2012-00141 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 3 Feb 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Mar 12.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Mar 12, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00409
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01925
Moreover, as indicated by the OPR, the Air Force did not engage in a service-wide effort to seek-out members who were already on terminal leave or who had already completed their pre-separation counseling, in order to provide them with additional counseling on the Post 9/11 GI Bill. ________________________________________________________________ requirements eligibility dependent met the 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs requirement to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01017
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. On 28 Jan 11, the applicant received pre-separation counseling and indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component (AC) Service Members that he wanted counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00542
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to request Transfer of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04639
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant received pre- separation counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03592
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting there are no records showing the applicant requested a waiver or extension to remain on active duty to qualify for the program to transfer education benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...