RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01072
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to participate in the Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Benefits
to Dependents program.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He applied for participation in the program prior to his 1 Nov 09
retirement date; however, he never received a response to his application.
He was later informed there was no record of his ever applying for the
program. He has since relocated and has no contact with the education
office at the base where he applied.
The applicant submitted no supporting documentation and his complete
submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 19 Apr 84 and was
progressively promoted to the grade of master sergeant having assumed that
grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jan 02. He retired on 1 Nov
09 after serving 25 years, 6 months and 12 days on active duty.
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected
Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible
for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:
• Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of
election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces
from the date of election.
• Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty
and/or selected reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by
either standard policy (service or DoD) or statute from committing to
4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time
allowed by such policy or statute, or
• Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from August 1,
2009, through August 1, 2013. A service member is considered to be
retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty
or 20 qualifying years of reserve service.
• For those individuals eligible for retirement on August 1, 2009,
no additional service is required.
• For those individuals who have an approved retirement date after
August 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, no additional service
is required.
• For those individuals eligible for retirement after August 1,
2009, and before August 1, 2010, 1 year of additional service
after approval of transfer is required.
• For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after August
1, 2010, and before August 1, 2011, 2 years of additional
service after approval of transfer are required.
• For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after August
1, 2011, and before August 1, 2012, 3 years of additional
service after approval of transfer required.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the Armed
Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1
Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years
of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve
four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can
transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their dependents. The
Department of Defense (DoD) via Directive Type Memo (DTM) 09-003 allowed a
service member that had an approved retirement dater after 1 Aug 09 and
before 1 Jul 10 to participate in the transfer of benefits without
incurring additional service obligation. Thirty-eight United States Code
(USC) Chapter 33, Section 3319(f)(1), Directive Type Memo (DTM) 09-003
3.g.(1) and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2306_AFGM1 18.G.(1), required
that the transfer of benefits be accomplished while serving as a member of
the Armed Forces.
DPSIT states the transfer of Education Benefits system began accepting
applications as of 27 Jun 09 with an effective date no earlier than 1 Aug
09.
DPSIT notes many service members thought they were eligible for the
transfer as long as they were serving on active duty and did not realize
that participating in the program required they do the transfer of
education benefits (TEB) while serving on active duty or selective reserve
status.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 May
10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PA does not provide a recommendation. A1PA states that members
may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected
Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient
to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the
future. Had those members sought clarification from an educational
counselor, read the DoD or Air Force guidance that was very clear on that
point, or taken other measures to make timely decisions before their
separation or retirement, they could have initiated a timely transfer of
benefits. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the
members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled
about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and
did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their
terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1
Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since
the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel.
The HQ USAF/A1PA complete evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 Aug
10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. While we note the steps the Air Force
office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible
personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the
applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps
necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In addition, we find
no basis to question the applicant’s account in this matter and do not find
it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to pursue use of
this important entitlement. Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt in
this matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the records be
corrected as indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 31 October 2009 he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill
Educational Benefits to a dependent, effective 1 November 2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is contingent
upon the completion of the necessary paperwork as indicated in the
attached letter from AFPC/DPSIT within 30 days.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010-01072 in
Executive Session on 5 October 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the record. The following documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Mar 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 May 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10.
Panel Chair
[pic]
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
[pic]
AFBCMR BC-2010-01072
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 31 October 2009, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11
GI Bill Educational Benefits to a dependent, effective 1 November 2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is
contingent upon the completion of the necessary paperwork as indicated in
the attached AFPC/DPSIT Memorandum within 30 days.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
HQ AFPC/DPSIT Memorandum
"This document contains information which must be protected IAW AFI 33-332
and DoD Regulation 5400.11; Privacy Act of 1974 as amended applies, and it
is For Official Use Only (FOUO)."
-----------------------
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02935
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an email stating he could request his retirement date be moved from 1 Aug 09 to 1 Sep 09 to take advantage of the new GI Bill and transfer benefits. The applicant’s last duty day was 31 Jul 09 with a 1 Aug 09 retirement date. Additionally, the application does not state applications would be received until 31 Jul 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01234
DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180
A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs requirement to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00415
During the time that he was attending his separation briefings, no information was available on the requirements for transferring benefits to dependents; specifically, the need to complete the transfer while on active duty. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01351
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after August 1, 2009 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00609
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319 (f)(1) states that an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed. In discussing this issue with education counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that many service members did not realize that...