Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
Original file (BC-2011-03876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2011-03876
		COUNSEL: NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career 
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the 
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to 
reenter the Air Force.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

1. His commander denied him reenlistment without his knowledge 
or the knowledge of his supervisors, and he did not receive 
ample time to challenge and rebut the RE code 2X.

2. He was under the impression that he was leaving the military 
of his own free will, with the intent of joining the reserves in 
the future.

3. He deployed five times to hostile remote areas in Afghanistan 
and Iraq; received multiple Air Force Achievement Medals; and 
Army Combat patches; was awarded the Air Force Good Conduct 
Medal; and served two overseas short tours.  

4. He served honorably; and all of his evaluation reports have 
been “5s” across the board with the exception of his last one, 
which was a “4.”  

In support of the appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
Air Force IMT 77, Letter of Evaluation and letters of support. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 8 May 01, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.

On 19 Jun 06, the applicant without authority, left his 
appointed place of duty.  For this misconduct he received an 
Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); reduction 
to the grade of airman first class, suspended through 27 Dec 06, 
after which time it would be remitted without further action 
unless sooner vacated; forfeiture of $450 pay per month for two 
months; and a reprimand. 

On 17 Nov 06, the applicant’s supervisor initiated an 
AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration, 
and non-recommended him for reenlistment.  The basis for the 
action was the applicant was identified under the Enlisted Date 
of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program.  

On 22 Nov 06, his commander non-selected the applicant for 
reenlistment, citing his identification under the Enlisted DOS 
Rollback Program.  

The applicant initialed the acknowledgement box in section IV; 
however, he did not sign and date the acknowledgement block in 
section IV. 

On 1 Dec 06, the applicant indicated he intended to appeal the 
commander’s decision and was given 10 calendar days (10 Dec 06) 
to submit his appeal to the military personnel flight (MPF).  

On 10 Dec 06, the applicant’s appeal package was not received by 
the military personnel flight for processing.  

On 7 May 07, the applicant was honorably discharged, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman, 
for Completion of Required Service.  He received an RE code of 
2X.  He served six years of total active duty service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the 
United States Air Force states commanders have selective 
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority.  

The SRP considers the member’s enlisted performance report 
ratings, unfavorable information from any substantiated source, 
the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and 
the airman’s ability, or lack of, to meet required training and 
duty performance levels.  

The applicant did not provide any proof of an error or 
injustice, but only states he and his supervisors were unaware 
of his non-selection and he was not provided ample time to 
appeal the decision. 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________






APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 2 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days.  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03876 in Executive Session on 10 Apr 12, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				Panel Chair
				Member
				Member







The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03876 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 11, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  AFPC/DPSOA, Letter, dated 7 Nov 11.
	Exhibit D.  SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 2 Dec 11.



				Panel Chair

4

3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103

    Original file (BC 2014 01103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842

    Original file (BC 2014 03842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193

    Original file (BC-2012-00193.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00175

    Original file (BC-2013-00175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00175

    Original file (BC 2013 00175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451

    Original file (BC 2013 03451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391

    Original file (BC 2013 02391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor “not recommended” him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165

    Original file (BC-2012-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...