RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00382
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be
changed to allow him to reenlist into Air National Guard (ANG).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He knows of several staff sergeants who had the same offense on
their record and they were allowed to reenlist. He believes his
RE code was given because of the military downsizing during the
Clinton administration.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, and DD Form 215, Correction to DD Fm 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 14 Dec 87, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force.
On 9 Apr 93, the applicants supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status
Consideration, and nonrecommended him for continued service. His
supervisor noted the applicants marginal duty performance along
with his not maintaining acceptable personal responsibility as
reflected in counseling sessions, Letters of Reprimand, and an
Article 15. The applicant appealed his nonselection for
continued service and, on 7 Apr 93, his appeal was denied. On 10
May 93, the applicant acknowledged the denial of his appeal.
He was honorably discharged on 13 Dec 93. He was credited with
6 years of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The governing Air Force
Instruction reflects commanders have selective reenlist selection
or nonselection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program
(SRP) considers the service members Enlisted Performance Report
ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source,
the service members willingness to comply with Air Force
standards, and or the service members ability or lack thereof to
meet required training and duty performance.
At the time of the applicants discharge he received an erroneous
RE code of 4I. Since the applicant was nonselected for
reenlistment by his commander, he should have received the RE
code 2X (First term, second term or career Airman considered but
not selected under the SRP). Based on the RE code 2X, the
applicant has to separate and was not eligible to remain in the
Air Force. While the 4I RE code is technically incorrect, the
applicant has provided no evidence to support his request for a
code that would allow him to reenlist. Accordingly, if the Board
is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be
administratively corrected to reflect the 2X RE code.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
20 May 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the
existence of an error or injustice. Although the applicant was
awarded an incorrect RE code at separation, we note this RE code
will be administratively corrected to 2X. We concur with this
administrative correction and do not find the evidence provided
is sufficient to support a change of the RE code that would allow
him reentry into military service. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
The requested relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-00382 in Executive Session on 6 Oct 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Dec 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Military Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 10 May 11.
Exhibit D. Letters SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicants commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed to 3K which denotes Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or 3B which denotes 1st or 2nd term or career airman ineligible to reenlist. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00382
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment. Applicant’s performance profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 14 Apr 87 8 1 Dec 87 7 1 Dec 88 7 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00548
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00548 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First term, second term or career Airman considered but not selected under the SRP) be changed to allow her to enlist into Air Force Reserve. ________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03241
He has provided no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-03241 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...