RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00140
INDEX CODE: 128.14
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to reflect he transferred his
entitlement to educational benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill
to his dependent.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to
his dependent and made an attempt to do so prior to retiring on
30 Sep 09. Because the system was not yet in place to do so, he
was asked to try again at a later date. He retired shortly
thereafter and can no longer access the necessary web site to
make the transfer as he is no longer on active duty. He showed
intent to transfer while still on active duty and should be
allowed to do so.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
Post-911 GI Bill Certificate of Eligibility and various pieces
of correspondence with the Department of Veterans Affairs
related to the matter under review.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate he was
retired for length of service in the grade of colonel (O-6),
effective 1 Oct 09.
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) who, on or after
1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and satisfies
the following service requirements, is eligible to transfer
their unused educational benefits to a qualifying dependent:
Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the
date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in
the Armed Forces from the date of election.
Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces
(active duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of
election, is precluded by either standard policy (service
or DoD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years,
and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed
by such policy or statute, or
Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from
August 1, 2009, through August 1, 2013. A service member
is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has
completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of
reserve service.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on
August 1, 2009, no additional service is required.
For those individuals who have an approved retirement
date after August 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, no
additional service is required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement after
August 1, 2009, and before August 1, 2010, 1 year of
additional service after approval of transfer is
required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after
August 1, 2010, and before August 1, 2011, 2 years of
additional service after approval of transfer are
required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after
August 1, 2011, and before August 1, 2012, 3 years of
additional service after approval of transfer required.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that Title 38, United
States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319 (f)(1) states that
an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while
serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is
executed. In discussing this issue with education counselors
and education service officers, they conveyed that many service
members did not realize that participating in the program
required they do the transfer of benefits in the Transfer of
Education Benefits (TEB) system while serving on active duty or
in Selected Reserve status.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 21 May 10 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PA does not provide a recommendation. A1PA states
that members may have had the impression that being on active
duty or in the Selected Reserve on the effective date of the
law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to vest them with the right to
transfer benefits at some time in the future. Had those members
sought clarification from an educational counselor, read the DoD
or Air Force guidance that was very clear on that point, or
taken other measures to make timely decisions before their
separation or retirement, they could have initiated a timely
transfer of benefits. However, the Board could find that there
was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09,
were not personally counseled about the need to execute a
transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have
ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their
terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as
early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member
on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the
record by Air Force personnel.
A complete copy of the AF/A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant on 2 Aug 10 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit F).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. While we
note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant, he
was not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps
necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In
addition, we find no basis to question his account in this
matter and do not find it reasonable that he would have
knowingly elected not to pursue use of this important
entitlement. Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt in this
matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the records be
corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 30 September 2009 he elected to transfer his Post
9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to a dependent, effective
1 October 2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is
contingent upon the completion of the necessary paperwork within
30 days as indicated in the attached letter from AFPC/DPSIT.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00140 in Executive Session on 5 Oct 10, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXX, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Jan 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 May 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, AF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10.
XXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01072
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01234
DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180
A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02935
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an email stating he could request his retirement date be moved from 1 Aug 09 to 1 Sep 09 to take advantage of the new GI Bill and transfer benefits. The applicant’s last duty day was 31 Jul 09 with a 1 Aug 09 retirement date. Additionally, the application does not state applications would be received until 31 Jul 09.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs requirement to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00609
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319 (f)(1) states that an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed. In discussing this issue with education counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that many service members did not realize that...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00415
During the time that he was attending his separation briefings, no information was available on the requirements for transferring benefits to dependents; specifically, the need to complete the transfer while on active duty. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force...