RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01816
INDEX CODE: 108.02
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: MR. ROBERT LAUGHLIN
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His permanent disability rating be increased from 30% to 80%.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Counsel states the medical documentation shows that due to the applicant’s
Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) he requires the use of a continuous positive
air pressure (CPAP) machine. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel
Council found the applicant only qualified for 30% by wrongfully
characterizing the applicant’s OSA as depicting “persistent daytime
hypersomnolence,” which is contrary to the express definition of the rating
code in the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities
(VASRD), which would require a 50% disability rating. On 22 Apr 08, the
Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) determined the applicant’s overall
combined disability rating to be 100%.
In support of his request, applicant provides counsel’s brief, copies of
the DVA rating decision dated 1 Aug 07 and 17 Apr 08 and other documents
associated with his physical evaluation board.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty on 15 Jul 85. On 13 Dec 06, his
commander recommended the applicant be medically retired because of
persistent sleep apnea with related sinus and allergy problems that
hindered his ability to get restful sleep at night, which in turn caused
him to be fatigued and exhausted during the duty day. A Medical Evaluation
Board (MEB) found the applicant unfit due to diagnosis of paroxysmal
supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) sleep apnea and referred his case to
the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). The IPEB findings, dated 7
Feb 07, indicated they found the applicant had a compensable and ratable
condition of OSA, controlled with CPAP and recommended a disability rating
of 0%. On 13 Feb 07, the applicant disagreed with the IPEB findings and
recommendation and requested a formal hearing. The Formal Physical
Evaluation Board (FPEB) findings, dated 20 Mar 07, indicated a diagnosis of
allergic rhinitis and OSA, controlled with CPAP; and conditions not
currently compensable or ratable of PSVT, gastroesophageal reflux disease
and hiatal hernia. The FPEB recommended permanent disability retirement
with a 10% disability rating. On 30 Mar 07, the applicant appealed to the
Secretary of the Air Force (SAFPC) disagreeing with the FPEB findings and
recommendation and requested a permanent retirement with an 80% disability
rating. On 2 May 07, SAFPC found the applicant unfit for his condition of
OSA, with persistent daytime hypersomnolence, associated with allergic
rhinitis rated at 30% disabling; and conditions not compensable or ratable
of PSVT, gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia. On 18 Jun 07,
the applicant was relieved from active duty and permanently disability
retired effective 19 Jun 07 with a combined compensable percentage for
disability of 30%. He served 21 years, 11 months, and 4 days of active
duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
HQ AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the Department of Defense and
the DVA disability evaluation systems operate under separate laws. Under
Title 10, USC, Physical Evaluation Boards must determine if a member’s
condition renders them unfit for continued military service relating to
their office, grade, rank or rating. The fact that a person may have a
medical condition does not mean that the condition is unfitting for
continued military service. To be unfitting, the condition must be such
that it alone precludes the member from fulfilling their military duties.
If the board renders a finding of unfit, the law provides appropriate
compensation due to the premature termination of their career. It is the
charge of the DVA to pick up where the Air Force must, by law, leave off.
Under Title 38, the DVA may rate any service-connected condition based upon
future employability or reevaluate based on changes in the severity of a
condition. This often results in different ratings by the two agencies.
The AFPC/DPSD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends alternatively changing the record to
reflect a medical retirement with the award of a 50% disability rating for
the applicant’s OSA. The BCMR Medical Consultant states unlike the VASRD
rating criteria the ratings are based upon the level of industrial, or
occupational, impairment. While these are vulnerable for subjective
interpretation, a mild level of impairment rates 0%, definite impairment
rates 30%, considerable impairment rates 50%, and total impairments rates
100%. It is likely then, that the FPEB and the SAFPC had the
aforementioned criteria in mind when applying the “0%” disability rating,
in the case of the former, and the “30%” rating awarded by the latter.
However, instead of justifying the 30% rating under “definite” industrial
impairment” criterion,” the SAFPC utilized the VASRD criterion, “persistent
daytime hypersomnolence,” to depict the level of severity; while appearing
to ignore the fact that the applicant required a CPAP device, which
otherwise warrants a 50% disability rating. The BCMR Medical Consultant
also finds it appropriate to associate the applicant’s allergic rhinitis,
utilizing a hyphenated disability rating code, as a recognition that it is
the coexistence of this co-morbid disorder that rendered the applicant’s
OSA unfitting and which cut his career short; while also acknowledging that
neither allergic rhinitis nor sinusitis, alone, would have been unfitting,
but not for the applicant’s OSA. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete
evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
In response to the AFPC/DPSD evaluation, counsel responds that the
applicant’s rating has to be based on the rating criteria, in other words,
the DVA rating chart, rather than pulling a percentage of out thin air and
applying it to the applicant’s case. A total rating of 30% is arbitrary
and capricious and is not based on applicable regulations and rating chart.
At the very least, the AFBCMR should award the applicant a 60% disability
rating. The counsel’s complete letter is at Exhibit E.
In response to the BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation, counsel writes
that while the applicant agrees with the recommendation of the BCMR Medical
Consultant to increase his OSA to 50%, he still believes that he is
entitled to a separate 10% rating for allergic rhinitis, which was found to
be unfitting and awarded to him by the FPEB and an award of at least 10%
for his PSVT. The applicant contends that both of these conditions
contributed to the end of his military career and as such should both be
found “unfitting” and subject to a minimal compensation of 10% for a total
evaluation of 70%. The counsel’s complete letter is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice warranting partial relief. After
carefully reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the BCMR Medical
Consultant that it appears the applicant’s condition was not properly
characterized according to the level of severity of the applicant's OSA.
Therefore, we believe that a change in his records is warranted to reflect
a 50% disability rating at the time of final disposition of his case. With
regard to counsel's contention that the applicant's allergic rhinitis is a
separate disabling condition and as such should be rated separately, we
note the BCMR Medical Consultant's recommendation that it would be
appropriate to associate the applicant's allergic rhinitis, utilizing a
hyphenated disability rating code as recognition that it is the coexistence
of this co-morbid disorder that rendered the applicant's OSA unfitting. We
agree with his recommendation.
4. Insufficient relevant has been presented to demonstrate the existence
of error or injustice with regard to the applicant's PSVT. We noted
counsel's contentions and defer to the evidence of record which shows that
this condition alone was not found unfitting by the disability evaluation
system and that this condition was well controlled with medication. We
note that, subsequent to the applicant's separation, his PSVT condition was
evaluated by the DVA and he was granted service connection and a 10%
compensable rating. But, we are constrained to note that while, by law,
the Department of Defense rates disabilities solely based on their impact
on the member’s ability to perform his or her duties, the DVA rates
disabilities based on their impact on social and industrial adaptability.
In view of the above and in the absence of persuasive evidence by the
applicant that successfully refutes the information in his record; we find
no basis to recommend relief on this portion of his request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 18 June 2007, he was found unfit to perform the duties of his
office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical disability, incurred
while he was entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in his case
was Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Allergic Rhinitis, VASRD code 6847-6522, rated
at 50%; that the degree of impairment was permanent; that the disability
was not due to intentional misconduct or willful neglect; that the
disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized absence; and
that the disability was not received in the line of duty as a direct result
of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war.
b. On 19 June 2007, he was retired by reason of physical disability
under the provisions of AFI 36-3212.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-01816
in Executive Session on 11 Dec 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Anthony P. Reardon, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following
documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2008-01816 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 May 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 12 Jun 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jul 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, Counsel, dated 19 Aug 08.
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 6 Oct 08.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Oct 08.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Oct 08.
GREGORY A. PARKER
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03201
Both the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) and Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) found the applicant unfit and recommended discharge with severance pay with a zero (0) percent disability rating. Additionally, the applicant’s inability to deploy and the requirement to utilize a CPAP machine were not measures for the severity of his medical condition under the Department of Defense (DoD) disability rating guidance for OSA at the time of the applicant’s discharge. Therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05034
Following a review of all available facts and evidence in the case, to include the testimony presented before the FPEB, the remarks by 2 the FPEB, IPEB, the service medical record, and the narrative summary of the MEB, the board concurred with the disposition recommended by the two previous boards and recommended discharge with severance pay with a combined disability rating of 20 percent. DPSD states no documentation was provided at any time during the DES processing of the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00371
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Following DPPD’s assessment, they conclude the applicant was treated fairly throughout the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, that he was properly rated under federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation, and that he was afforded the opportunity for further review as provided by federal law and policy. As...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00671
The Board noted that the CI was not using CPAP at the time of the separation. After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The diagnosis in his finding of unfitness for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, VASRD code...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00383
Despite normal tests, the CI continued to have symptoms and the Cardiologist opined his chest pain and palpitations were not cardiac conditions. The CI’s symptoms of chest pain and palpitations did not result from a cardiac condition. No VASRD code for non-cardiac chest pain and palpitations exists and the CI’s disability must be rated analogously.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00536
The conditions, exercise induced asthma and OSA requiring C-PAP as requested for consideration, meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, are addressed below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting conditions. In the matter of the exercise induced asthma with OSA requiring CPAP conditions, the Board unanimously recommends a TDRL and permanent service disability rating of 50%, coded 6602-6847 IAW VASRD §4.96 and §4.97. RECOMMENDATION : The Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03087
The OSA has responded well to CPAP. On 4 June 2010, the applicant non-concurred with the IPEB findings and requested a formal hearing with counsel, contending she was unfit for duty and should receive a 30 percent disability rating for her Depression with Anxiety and another 30 percent for migraine headaches for a combined disability rating of 50 percent and a permanent retirement. The FPEB considered her OSA as a condition that could be unfitting but was not currently compensable or...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00254
The Commander’s statement and the Behavioral Health screening exam do, however, document issues with somnolence and alertness which could be an unfitting impairment. This is therefore the Board’s recommendation in regards to this condition. Other Conditions .
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00509
An IPEB dated 7 April 2008 adjudicated “bilateral lower leg pain with CS as unfitting rated 21% (including bilateral factor) with application of the DoDI 1332.39 and VASRD. The left leg examination was normal and without pain. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to service disability rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01920
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. There is no evidence in this case that OSA was associated with any functional impairment that was not corrected by CPAP. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.